tecolote;4853220 said:And put Parnell at RG. I would, it would send a message not only to Free but to the rest of the team. If you stink up the joint, you are riding the pine.
Of course, Garrett would never do that.
FiveRings;4853227 said:You mean RT? No. Free has shown much better play than Parnell ( just not of late)?and while neither of them are stellar options the last thing we need is another moving part on the line
tecolote;4853220 said:And put Parnell at RG (RT). I would, it would send a message not only to Free but to the rest of the team. If you stink up the joint, you are riding the pine.
Of course, Garrett would never do that.
FiveRings;4853227 said:You mean RT? No. Free has shown much better play than Parnell ( just not of late)?and while neither of them are stellar options the last thing we need is another moving part on the line

laythewood28;4853245 said:I wouldn't do it with the short week, But for next game yes. I think you put Parnell in during their layoff. Hopefully Romo can last this game.
burmafrd;4853286 said:this team needs a kick to the head
Benching Free for bad play would be a good thing from the point of view of making everyone aware that they can be replaced
the sense of entitlement that this team has had needs to be destroyed
When you keep playing Ogletree despite his bad play when other options are available it sends a bad message
Bench both of them and play someone else.
fortdick;4853318 said:After two wins in a row, why does the team need a kick in the head?
Parnell did not play well last game. Go back and look.
fortdick;4853318 said:After two wins in a row, why does the team need a kick in the head?
Parnell did not play well last game. Go back and look.
yeah, I have to agree....Hailmary;4853234 said:This. We need more continuity not less.
