Parcells4Life
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,550
- Reaction score
- 9,379
The team is currently 68 million under the cap. This pick costs us 12 million more against the cap than the average first round receiver.
Age wise he’s 6 months older than Ridley.
So for those who can’t believe we’d give up a first for a WR, that means you didn’t want Ridley even considered last year or a first round pick in the draft this year?
If he plays 7 seasons here and puts up 4-5 1,000 yard seasons is he worth it?
This isn’t RW11 or JG84 trade because only 1 pick was surrendered as opposed to multiple in those.
And the FO has said in scouting circles we were almost definitely taking a WR in the first next year. So aside from him being more expensive, what’s wrong with getting next years draft pick early?
They were always going to do whatever they could to give Dak every chance possible. If they’d surrendered more than 1 pick yes that’d be horrible or if he was only on the team through this year like ET. But 1.5 years of control, when the alternative was give him to Philly, I’m glad he’s here
Age wise he’s 6 months older than Ridley.
So for those who can’t believe we’d give up a first for a WR, that means you didn’t want Ridley even considered last year or a first round pick in the draft this year?
If he plays 7 seasons here and puts up 4-5 1,000 yard seasons is he worth it?
This isn’t RW11 or JG84 trade because only 1 pick was surrendered as opposed to multiple in those.
And the FO has said in scouting circles we were almost definitely taking a WR in the first next year. So aside from him being more expensive, what’s wrong with getting next years draft pick early?
They were always going to do whatever they could to give Dak every chance possible. If they’d surrendered more than 1 pick yes that’d be horrible or if he was only on the team through this year like ET. But 1.5 years of control, when the alternative was give him to Philly, I’m glad he’s here