If Ware ends up with 5 sacks?

Nors said:
Nope - all excuses for Ware - he was brought here to get to QB.

So far he has underachieved for all the excuses you mentioned.

For Dallas to win we need him to step up - he was the #11 overall.

Yea when teams have to put a LT(teams best T) and a RB/FB/TE on him it reallymeans he's underacheiving.

Let's not forget that the rest of the LB arent average and below average LB, and havent been any kind of force.
 
I was wondering how long it would take for the turning on Ware to begin, since you were wanting Merriman at #11.

So very predictable.

Real fans would rather be wrong and have it help the team, they don't root for failure and injuries.

Seems very clear where some stand.
 
dargonking999 said:
Yea when teams have to put a LT(teams best T) and a RB/FB/TE on him it reallymeans he's underacheiving.

Let's not forget that the rest of the LB arent average and below average LB, and havent been any kind of force.


I think you're exhaggerating just a bit. Ware doesn't get doubled that often.


How many sacks did Dwight Freeney get as a rookie? Think maybe he was double teamed a bit being that he was the only DL worth a crap on that team at the time?

Double teams occur... you still have to get to the QB. And, again, he doesn't even get doubled that often.


That said, hopefully Parcells is right and he'll improve next year. I think he played a solid game vs the Giants. If he improves from that game we have a very good chance of winning.
 
dargonking999 said:
Yea when teams have to put a LT(teams best T) and a RB/FB/TE on him it reallymeans he's underacheiving.

Let's not forget that the rest of the LB arent average and below average LB, and havent been any kind of force.

It's not about Ware, it's about Nors not wanting him at #11.

Over 13,000 posts and the vast majority are not about football.
 
Rack said:
I think you're exhaggerating just a bit. Ware doesn't get doubled that often.


How many sacks did Dwight Freeney get as a rookie? Think maybe he was double teamed a bit being that he was the only DL worth a crap on that team at the time?

Double teams occur... you still have to get to the QB. And, again, he doesn't even get doubled that often.


That said, hopefully Parcells is right and he'll improve next year. I think he played a solid game vs the Giants. If he improves from that game we have a very good chance of winning.


And when he doesnt, he is always at the QB, and halfastep from getting a sack.

Let's not forget, with the emergence of Ware, Ellis is on pace to become the teams first double digit sack leader since.......a long time.
 
dargonking999 said:
And when he doesnt, he is always at the QB, and halfastep from getting a sack.

Let's not forget, with the emergence of Ware, Ellis is on pace to become the teams first double digit sack leader since.......a long time.



1. No, he isn't always at the QB when he's not double teamed. What games have you been watching?

2. Ebenezer Ekuban was "Close" to get a sack pretty often in Dallas. Close means jack.


3. Ellis was "on pace" to get like 16 sacks at one point LAST YEAR, then he disappeared. I think he had 8 sacks last year with like 5 games to go. He got 1 sack the last 4 or 5 games. So your attempt at a "point" is irrelevant. I wouldn't be surprised if Ellis still finishes with less then 10 sacks.
 
Galian Beast said:
5 sacks wouldn't be fine with me.

I simply have higher expectations for him. But he certainly doesn't need double digits.

Isn't he one of the league leaders in QB pressures?

Why is it that expectations for EVERYONE involved is INCREDIBLY high in Big D?
 
Rack said:
1. No, he isn't always at the QB when he's not double teamed. What games have you been watching?

2. Ebenezer Ekuban was "Close" to get a sack pretty often in Dallas. Close means jack.

I believe Drew Bledsoe would tell you differently. :D
 
blindzebra said:
It's not about Ware, it's about Nors not wanting him at #11.

Over 13,000 posts and the vast majority are not about football.


Again a non football post from BZ whing about said topic.
If Ware ended up with 5 sacks as I posed the question months ago in this thread? Is that under expectations? I say yes.

Back to your rants.
 
Nors said:
Again a non football post from BZ whing about said topic.
If Ware ended up with 5 sacks as I posed the question months ago in this thread? Is that under expectations? I say yes.

Back to your rants.

How many of your 13,000 deal with football?

ACTUALLY DEAL WITH FOOTBALL?

We all know why you dug this up, I tell it like it is, and you go into your persecuted/talk football, spin mode.

You are as predictable as the sun coming up tomorrow.

p.s. edit, still have not seen you at detox since your boy played like crap, FYI not posting for a week does not count as behaving for a week.:D
 
I agree that if he gets only 5 sacks it is most definantely a disappointment. Sacks was the reason he was brought here.
 
Dawgs0916 said:
I agree that if he gets only 5 sacks it is most definantely a disappointment. Sacks was the reason he was brought here.

Gee, I can't even see Nors' lips move when you talk.

Quick Nors drink some water during his next post.:lmao2:
 
blindzebra said:
Gee, I can't even see Nors' lips move when you talk.

Quick Nors drink some water during his next post.:lmao2:

Yet another non football post from the BZ after he whines about "that"

Yes, its pretty clear if Ware ends with 5 sacks thats below expectations.

I'm rooting for him to tack on anotyer 4-5 more and we win out. We need to get the QB more from the edge.
 
I've posted in the week and do as I please.

Back to thread - add something football related or go away. This thread had nothing to do with Bledsoe but thats just you being a jackass. Move on
 
Cbz40 said:
Ware will not be a bust.........1,2,5,10, 11 sack it doesn't matter...he will not be a bust

LOL...so you say if he got 1 sack next year and he averaged that throughout his career he would not be a bust?
 
Nors said:
I've posted in the week and do as I please.

Back to thread - add something football related or go away. This thread had nothing to do with Bledsoe but thats just you being a jackass. Move on

Yawn...

Just what football related posts have you made?

Nice pot kettle post you made here, Norsy.

Speaking of going away, should I post a link to the thread where you boasted about killing the zone by leaving?

Why not put your money where your ego is, and prove it?
 
I think he meant this year only about his sack totals meaning he's a bust. I wouldn't say hes a bust but anyone who says that having only 5 sacks for the year isn't a disappointment is lying.
 
Lawrence Taylor had zero sacks in 1981, his first year.

Ware is a rookie, let him develop.
 
Ware is adjusting to NFL and new position. Remember this is a small school kid who is adjusting to a new position. As Parcells said he's not big enough to go up against NFL Tackles all game.

That has proven out - Ware can get some outside pressure but once the Tackles get into him its over. Another year in the NFL weight system will do wonders.

I was expecting more than 4-5 sacks. He has to step it up down the stretch - JMO
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,634
Messages
13,823,456
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top