If we sign T.O. do we cut Keyshawn or Glenn?

[rojan]

If we sign T.O, do we cut Keyshawn or Glenn...I love Keyshawns play and want him to be here next year...



Imagine we get TO, cut Key and he signs with the Eagles??That would suck

 

[DragonCowboy]

IF we sign T.O., we have the money to keep all three, unless we want to just throw money at everyone, we would have to let go of Key.

 

[AmishCowboy]

I would think that Keyshawn would get cut. He won't be happy on the bench, with Glenn being the speed receiver and T.O. the posession receiver who can get deep sometimes.

 

[rojan]

IF we sign T.O., we have the money to keep all three, unless we want to just throw money at everyone, we would have to let go of Key.

That sucks...I was just watching a highlight real of Key and he has made some amazing catching in his 2 years here.

 

[DragonCowboy]

That sucks...I was just watching a highlight real of Key and he has made some amazing catching in his 2 years here.

don't worry man. 80% chance he stays. What I meant was that if the Cowboys wanted to have a MONSTER offseason and get the best guy at every one of their need positions (which we already know won't happen), Key will have to go. So there are real good chances of Key staying.

 

[Yeagermeister]

Neither....leave TO alone

 

[dbair1967]

don't worry man. 80% chance he stays. .

and there is a 100% chance we wont sign Owens

David

 

[DragonCowboy]

and there is a 100% chance we wont sign Owens

David

I wish. For some reason though, I think we have a pretty high chance of signing Owens. I hate it, but theres about a 40-45% chance the mold is coming to Dallas.

 

[LittleBoyBlue]

Why do you think we would have to cut Glenn or Key.

The idea, I thought would be to have ALL THREE on field.

1. Glenn - deep, good hands, speedster, stretch the D.
2. Key - all over, great hands, chain mover - always accounted for.
3. T.O. - Surefire threat, great hands, escapability, YAC/RAC

You put TO with Key and Glenn = TO is more of a monster.

I think Key would work out fine with TO. They are more alike then they are not.

 

[MichaelWinicki]

Why do you think we would have to cut Glenn or Key.

The idea, I thought would be to have ALL THREE on field.

1. Glenn - deep, good hands, speedster, stretch the D.
2. Key - all over, great hands, chain mover - always accounted for.
3. T.O. - Surefire threat, great hands, escapability, YAC/RAC

You put TO with Key and Glenn = TO is more of a monster.

I think Key would work out fine with TO. They are more alike then they are not.

Great... 30+ wide receivers. Why am I underwhelmed?

 

[big dog cowboy]

You put TO with Key and Glenn = TO is more of a monster.

TO is more than enough of a monster for me already. Just say no to TO.

 

[LittleBoyBlue]

Great... 30+ wide receivers. Why am I underwhelmed?

I hear ya... but Key and Glenn can STILL play... TO can FLATOUT play... I not locking the stigma of 30+ to this scenario...

I think the 3 on the field keeps them healthier and young... less beatens per WR...

 

[DragonCowboy]

I hear ya... but Key and Glenn can STILL play... TO can FLATOUT play... I not locking the stigma of 30+ to this scenario...

I think the 3 on the field keeps them healthier and young... less beatens per WR...

I understand what you're saying. If we HAVE to get T.O., that would be a great WR corps. I'm just hoping that we sign T.O. to a 1 or 2 year deal, something small. If T.O. wasn't going to cause problems, I would have no problem with it. However, if he returns to his cancer self, I would jettison him to Cuba.

btw, nice sig pic.

 

[VirusX]

You know im going to laugh if we sign TO and he goes off. Then the majority of these TO haters are going to have him in their sigs and kissing his big black arse.

 

[TDHND]

Oh boy let's get rid of one player I don't like for another one.

 

[DawnOfANewD]

You know im going to laugh if we sign TO and he goes off. Then the majority of these TO haters are going to have him in their sigs and kissing his big black arse.

We'd have our 3rd straight #1 WR (along with Irvin and Keyshawn) who was, uh, a strong personality, but productive.

 

[LittleBoyBlue]

You know im going to laugh if we sign TO and he goes off. Then the majority of these TO haters are going to have him in their sigs and kissing his big black arse.

Yeah a few might follow my lead but then I am guessing there will be alot of guys that just say "TD Bledsoe" when he throws to TO and TO scores LOL

I just want TO the player. Thats my hope. Foolish or not. No one knows yet. You cant look at history and say he will never learn. Well you can... but until it happens. I STILL give him benefit of doubt. Its a human thing. LOL

 

[LittleBoyBlue]

We'd have our 3rd straight #1 WR (along with Irvin and Keyshawn) who was, uh, a strong personality, but productive.

Why break the tradition.

Irvin = productive
Keyshawn = productive
Owens = productive... maybe even moreso than Irvin? Who knows? Irvin has to see himself in OWENS... its that obvious when they talk to each other and when Irvin is gushing over TO. Irvin is smitten!

 

[rojan]

I wonder if Ownes will wont to wear #88 if he comes here...That would be awsome

 

[big dog cowboy]

If we HAVE to get T.O.

Actually, no we don't.