If Westbrook doesn't fumble...we're 2-2 right now...

newlander

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,205
Reaction score
123
and o-2 in the division. Wade and his staff didn't get the team ready today and this time it cost them. I don't know what it will take, but sadly I don't think Wade has "it". Red called a bad game with all the passing too. 8 runs from the line of scrimmage? pathetic.............:bang2: :bang2: :bang2:
 
newlander;2292956 said:
and o-2 in the division. Wade and his staff didn't get the team ready today and this time it cost them. I don't know what it will take, but sadly I don't think Wade has "it". Red called a bad game with all the passing too. 8 runs from the line of scrimmage? F;'in pathetic.............:bang2: :bang2: :bang2:

If you mom had balls he be your dad.
 
newlander;2292956 said:
and o-2 in the division. Wade and his staff didn't get the team ready today and this time it cost them. I don't know what it will take, but sadly I don't think Wade has "it". Red called a bad game with all the passing too. 8 runs from the line of scrimmage? F;'in pathetic.............:bang2: :bang2: :bang2:
Westbrook didn't fumble, McSlabb faked him out with the ball.:laugh2:
 
If we dont have 12 men on the field after a timeout,we are 4-0
 
WHat a bunch of bull**** if Romo doesnt fumble, and we dont get a BS PI called on us we blow them out

I swear the IQ of this board is in the negative numbers after a loss
 
Are you serious? You could say the same thing about Romo fumbling in the endzone.
 
newlander;2292956 said:
and o-2 in the division. Wade and his staff didn't get the team ready today and this time it cost them. I don't know what it will take, but sadly I don't think Wade has "it". Red called a bad game with all the passing too. 8 runs from the line of scrimmage? pathetic.............:bang2: :bang2: :bang2:

No one's gonna listen, all they want to hear is 13-3 last year and superbowl bound this year. God forbid we actually have real problems that we need to fix or aspects of the game we simply do poorly.
 
I know I'm over reacting, and I have a right to since I'm numb from this loss. But after this last season was over, I said that Wade may not make it through the year if his defense continues on this path.

Reeves single-handedly cost us the NY game, well not by himself, but a big reason, so Jerry did his part and went out and drafted #1 corner and Pacman.

Jerry has giving Wade brick and concrete and he wants Jerry to build a house, not a wooden shed.
 
If Romo doesn't throw that interception, we get ready to blow Philly out. Or if we doesn't fumble, we still drive down the field up 14-13. So these if's if's if's aren't going to work.
 
yea and if Hurd catches the onside kick right in his hands we are probably 4-0see how easy that works?
 
Da Hammer;2293086 said:
yea and if Hurd catches the onside kick right in his hands we are probably 4-0see how easy that works?

Hardly with the way the offense was playing all day.
 
TheCount;2293112 said:
Hardly with the way the offense was playing all day.
with the way they were playing prevent late in the 4th we probably do score... IMO...
 
If Hurd comes down with the onside kick, we're 4-0.

Don't get stupid. It was a bad loss, but don't get stupid.
 
superpunk;2293136 said:
If Hurd comes down with the onside kick, we're 4-0.

Don't get stupid. It was a bad loss, but don't get stupid.


I wouldn't consider anything guaranteed, there wasn't any time left and the Skins would not have played prevent like in the first half.
 
If Romo doesn't throw a pick down 6 we win. If Denver doesn't turn it over 4 times they win. If if if... He did fumble, and it doesn't matter. Fact is that in the NFL you can't take a week off. PERIOD. My problem is Garrett gets away from the run way too quickly in games.
 
clayman;2293154 said:
I wouldn't consider anything guaranteed, there wasn't any time left and the Skins would not have played prevent like in the first half.
Consider my statement within the premise of this hypothetical thread, and then it should make more sense. You don't need to refute the idea that we would have scored.
 
clayman;2293154 said:
I wouldn't consider anything guaranteed, there wasn't any time left and the Skins would not have played prevent like in the first half.

There wasn't any time left? We would have gotten the ball at midfield with 1:40 to go in the game. That's ample time to do anything.
 
StylisticS;2293177 said:
There wasn't any time left? We would have gotten the ball at midfield with 1:40 to go in the game. That's ample time to do anything.
And all we needed was a FG too.
 
Back
Top