Rogerthat12
DWAREZ
- Messages
- 14,605
- Reaction score
- 9,989
Eddie said:Our OL is sub-par.
That's going to be the difference AGAIN this season. Shoot me now. :bang2:
Ok :bang2::laugh1:
Eddie said:Our OL is sub-par.
That's going to be the difference AGAIN this season. Shoot me now. :bang2:
lspain1 said:Well, I'm not here to argue about LB's. I don't think we are a super bowl team. Our OL seems suspect to me and our kicking game has a big question mark on it as well.
It could be. Many writers are picking us so we must have something going.eduncan22 said:Im gonna ask...Is this a Super Bowl team?
bbgun said:No. The o-line and kicking game will continue to be our undoing. Plus, we're still counting on linebackers to get sacks. Fergy and Spears are runstuffers at best.
eduncan22 said:What ya think?
I watched the preseason. Our Defense rocks.
If they can stay "injury free...."
Hostile said:Not yet, but by the end of the season, it could be. A lot of things would have to happen.
Flo and Columbo would have to stay healthy with Columbo living up to his draft status of a long time ago.
Vandy would heave to return to the forum he had before his last kick last year.
Julius and Barber would have to move the chains and run the clock.
TO and Bledsoe would need some chemistry with no circus atmosphere. I still think we're a passing offense not a run offense.
Few injuries. None would be better but is unrealistic.
The defense needs to apply constant pressure in every way possible.
Those things could hapen right off the bat, but I think they are more likely developed and part of character.
Kangaroo said:That is what LBers are suppose to do in a 3-4 and dlinemen are suppose to be run stuffer and eat up linemen :bang2:
Lets see Pittsburg a 3-4 defense got 47 team sacks the two players with the most sacks where
Porter 10.5 and haggans 9 both where LB's
The next highest was 3.5 DE
Then we had 5 players that tied at 3 sacks here is the break down by poistions
1. Lb
2. SS
3. DB
4. LB
5. DE
So the Superbowl defense had just as many sacks from their secondary as their dline
So would you like to withdraw your statement