I don't think it was sketchy blocking at all. I think you are giving to much discredit to the line and not enough credit to the Jags o-line. If anything need to be criticized it should be the play calling. (in that respect anyhow) They should have ran more running plays wide. With Jones speed, he can beat the line wide, but you arn't moving the middle of that brick wall very often. I say more pulling plays. You know like Emmitt used to do with Nate Newton.abersonc said:To quote Tom Jackson.. "are you ********?"
JJ had a decent game against a very tough DL with some sketchy blocking.
Thank you!jay cee said:you will be waiting for a long time for someone to come up with any kind of logic for that kind of post DE.
He has enough vision to realize that he is not going to outrun some defender, who has come into the backfield virtually untouched to the outside, so he ducks his head and tries to get what he can, and at least minimize the yards lost.
That's why many coaches will tell you that some of the best runs may only be for minimal gain.
Jones may not be a great back, but I know the O-line he's running behind is not great.
I will be more than happy with him, if he can continue this kind of production, running behind this Line.
:laugh2:jrumann59 said:So you can find a nice soft spot to land on.
WoodysGirl said:What I'll say is that I thought the game plan was very pass heavy...so neither Julius or Barber were utilized as normal.
nyc said:I don't think it was sketchy blocking at all. I think you are giving to much discredit to the line and not enough credit to the Jags o-line. If anything need to be criticized it should be the play calling. (in that respect anyhow) They should have ran more running plays wide. With Jones speed, he can beat the line wide, but you arn't moving the middle of that brick wall very often. I say more pulling plays. You know like Emmitt used to do with Nate Newton.