Boysboy;2304318 said:Even if we had won that game, SF would still have had HFA via tiebreaker advantage.
However-the '94 reg loss @SF was REALLY a killer-we had like 3 TOs in the redzone, and Erik Williams' presence was missed as Rickey Jackson took Larry Allen to the woodshed. Otherwise, we would have played the Niners in the NFCCG at TX Stadium instead, and likely would have 3-peated.
Actually the boys were winning 23-20 with about 1:30 to go.They got the ball very deep in their territory. I remember Brad Sham and Hansen saying that they couldn't believe they were passing instead of running the ball. Aikman was hit as he was throwing it. Emmitt tried to recover it and run with it but as he touched the ball he was tackled and fumbled again which is where the skins scored and won the game. Had emmitt just kicked the ball away it would have been a safety and we would have won 23-22. The skins were just getting their *** beat for most of the game. It's one of those games where a team completely dominates but ends up losing. Don't know how those things happen but they happen.Don Corleone;2304316 said:I actually think it was Aikman's fumble that Emmitt picked up and then mysteriously tossed it to a Commanders defender. I think we were on the brink of scoring and winning that game when it happened.
CowboyMark;2304577 said:Actually the boys were winning 23-20 with about 1:30 to go.They got the ball very deep in their territory. I remember Brad Sham and Hansen saying that they couldn't believe they were passing instead of running the ball. Aikman was hit as he was throwing it. Emmitt tried to recover it and run with it but as he touched the ball he was tackled and fumbled again which is where the skins scored and won the game. Had emmitt just kicked the ball away it would have been a safety and we would have won 23-22. The skins were just getting their *** beat for most of the game. It's one of those games where a team completely dominates but ends up losing. Don't know how those things happen but they happen.
Boysboy;2304218 said:Then explain to me how the '92 team got beat badly by the LOWLY Rams in Dec? Or how about the '93 team that got spanked by lowly Atlanta(they were getting beaten badly BEFORE Emmitt went down)?
Yep. Bernie Kosar started that game, and he had only been with the team for a little over a week at that point.dbair1967;2304615 said:they got beat by the Rams in midseason (we were 8-1, they were 3-6) and did not get beaten badly. We got beat 27-23.
The 93 loss to the Falcons Emmitt left on the first or second series of the game as I recall, and I was there. Aikman also DNP that week. We were down 13-0 at the half of that game.
Don Corleone;2304247 said:Yes. And the loss the Eagles was a complete thrashing. Final score was like 37-7 or something. We really stunk it up, but righted the ship to a 13-3 record in 1992...and a Super Bowl victory.
The loss to the skins that year was kinda like the loss we had with Romo at QB in 2006 at FedEx. A controversial play at the end of the game resulting in a loss. It was the most bizarre play I've seen.
dbair1967;2304615 said:they got beat by the Rams in midseason (we were 8-1, they were 3-6) and did not get beaten badly. We got beat 27-23.
The 93 loss to the Falcons Emmitt left on the first or second series of the game as I recall, and I was there. Aikman also DNP that week. We were down 13-0 at the half of that game.
Boysboy;2304636 said:I was in Europe in '93 and was crammed in a tiny 1 bedroom apt at the time. The best I could get was radio, and the soundwaves on CBS sports radio was VERY sketchy(at best).
Didn't realize Emmitt left in the 2nd series-it sounded like they said he left like a few minutes before halftime down 13-7.
dbair1967;2304670 said:I'd have to find the box score, but I am pretty sure he got hurt on his first or second carry ...everyone there thought he had broken his leg or something because of how bad it looked...it was some sort of thigh injury if I remember right
Bruised quadriceps IIRC.dbair1967;2304670 said:I'd have to find the box score, but I am pretty sure he got hurt on his first or second carry ...everyone there thought he had broken his leg or something because of how bad it looked...it was some sort of thigh injury if I remember right
Don Corleone;2304316 said:I actually think it was Aikman's fumble that Emmitt picked up and then mysteriously tossed it to a Commanders defender. I think we were on the brink of scoring and winning that game when it happened.
When I get home from work, I'm going to try to find the clip on youtube.
In the end, the loss did matter a bit because we wound up having to play the NFC Champ game in San Fran, but we did win the Super Bowl.
Bob Sacamano;2304194 said:didn't we lose a game to the Skins? wasn't there a point in one of our Super Bowl winning teams, that we lost both times to the Commanders?
just curious
BraveHeartFan;2304828 said:1995 Superbowl Championship season we lost both times to the Skins. It was made worse that year because there were all the rumors, and speculation, from those in the Switzer camp that Aikman had intentionally lost those games to the Skins so Norv could look good and save his job, because the Skins that year were pretty terrible. I think they might have finished 6-10 at best, might have been 4-12.
SkinsHokieFan;2304955 said:6-10, with a 27-23 win over Dallas (Aikman got injured in the first half and left the game at RFK) and a 24-17 win with Heath Shuler at QB in Dallas
Those Skins were 6-10.BraveHeartFan;2304828 said:1995 Superbowl Championship season we lost both times to the Skins. It was made worse that year because there were all the rumors, and speculation, from those in the Switzer camp that Aikman had intentionally lost those games to the Skins so Norv could look good and save his job, because the Skins that year were pretty terrible. I think they might have finished 6-10 at best, might have been 4-12.
windward;2304965 said:Those Skins were 6-10.
Really frustrating losses.
Game 1, Aikman goes out in the first quarter and our offense stalls with Wade Wilson under center. Terry Allen runs all over our d. The O finally gets going, but we fall short 27-23
Game 2 Can't get the ball in the endzone. Again, too little, too late as we fall 24-17.
Don Corleone;2304247 said:Yes. And the loss the Eagles was a complete thrashing. Final score was like 37-7 or something. We really stunk it up, but righted the ship to a 13-3 record in 1992...and a Super Bowl victory.
The loss to the skins that year was kinda like the loss we had with Romo at QB in 2006 at FedEx. A controversial play at the end of the game resulting in a loss. It was the most bizarre play I've seen.
Went ahead on a Kelvin Martin punt return.CanadianCowboysFan;2304994 said:31-10
In the Ram game, the Cowboys were way ahead but choked it away.