Manwiththeplan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,182
- Reaction score
- 7,688
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...nant-girlfriend-seeks-custody-18-year-old-son
So of course Rae Carruth wants custody of his son. And I'm sure it's just a coincidence that due to the medical condition he caused when he killed his mother, Chancellor receives money from the state, and who ever has custody of him, has control over the money.
Some of the high points (actually low points) of this article are:
"I should be raising my son. His mother should be raising her son," Carruth said. "Ms. Adams should not be doing this and I want that responsibility back.
"I feel like he might not ever have his mother in his life but he could still have me and I could still make a difference and I don't think that's anyone's responsibility when I'm still here."
Want that responsibility back? When did he ever have it? Who the **** is he to say, Ms. Adams should not be doing this? She should not HAVE to do this, but due to his actions, she needs to.
Carruth also challenged that his motive for having Cherica Adams killed was to avoid having to pay child support, noting child support never was mentioned as motive during the trial. He said the motive was more to do with Cherica being unwilling to get an abortion.
Okay, you had her killed because she refused to get an abortion...why? There are millions of women that don't get abortions, why isn't he killing them? Because, they aren't carrying your child and you won't have to pay CHILD SUPPORT for them.
MODS: Title should say Began to think otherwise, please edit. And I could have sworn I was in the NFL Zone, please move there as well.
So of course Rae Carruth wants custody of his son. And I'm sure it's just a coincidence that due to the medical condition he caused when he killed his mother, Chancellor receives money from the state, and who ever has custody of him, has control over the money.
Some of the high points (actually low points) of this article are:
"I should be raising my son. His mother should be raising her son," Carruth said. "Ms. Adams should not be doing this and I want that responsibility back.
"I feel like he might not ever have his mother in his life but he could still have me and I could still make a difference and I don't think that's anyone's responsibility when I'm still here."
Want that responsibility back? When did he ever have it? Who the **** is he to say, Ms. Adams should not be doing this? She should not HAVE to do this, but due to his actions, she needs to.
Carruth also challenged that his motive for having Cherica Adams killed was to avoid having to pay child support, noting child support never was mentioned as motive during the trial. He said the motive was more to do with Cherica being unwilling to get an abortion.
Okay, you had her killed because she refused to get an abortion...why? There are millions of women that don't get abortions, why isn't he killing them? Because, they aren't carrying your child and you won't have to pay CHILD SUPPORT for them.
MODS: Title should say Began to think otherwise, please edit. And I could have sworn I was in the NFL Zone, please move there as well.
