Verdict
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,230
- Reaction score
- 20,501
A team's success, or lack thereof, is often determined in no small part to injuries. Depth is the only insurance policy that can somewhat negate injuries. Many posters keep putting Philly on a very lofty perch as the elite team to beat in the NFC. While that position can be defended are you really that scared of Philly if Donovan McNabb, or T.O., or both are sidelined by injury? What about a dose of injury to Westbrook, or the defensive secondary?
Dallas has more depth than it has had in some time. If we can be relatively healthy there is no reason we can't win the NFC. Our depth will probably allow us to still make a run at the NFC championship, if our losses aren't season ending, too numerous, or at positions of little depth.
Philly is beatable by us, as is EVERY other team in the NFL. Injuries could also close the gap between Philly and the rest of the NFC. With parity the way it is I think Philly had their chance last year and did not take advantage of it. I do NOT believe Philly win the NFC this year.
Dallas has more depth than it has had in some time. If we can be relatively healthy there is no reason we can't win the NFC. Our depth will probably allow us to still make a run at the NFC championship, if our losses aren't season ending, too numerous, or at positions of little depth.
Philly is beatable by us, as is EVERY other team in the NFL. Injuries could also close the gap between Philly and the rest of the NFC. With parity the way it is I think Philly had their chance last year and did not take advantage of it. I do NOT believe Philly win the NFC this year.