CFZ Instead of a soft rebuild, the 2024 season became a kamikaze mission

Bobhaze

Staff member
Messages
18,210
Reaction score
71,540
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The more I think about it, maybe “soft rebuild” was accurate in this sense - the Cowboys have already been “soft” for far too long. So instead of just a normal rebuild, maybe it truly is a “soft rebuild".
:laugh:
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,081
Reaction score
38,710
The more I think about it, maybe “soft rebuild” was accurate in this sense - the Cowboys have already been “soft” for far too long. So instead of just a normal rebuild, maybe it truly is a “soft rebuild".
:laugh:
I’m not sure this season is worthy of using the word “ rebuild “ in anyway. We didn’t make any kind of real effort to rebuild.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,081
Reaction score
38,710
I'm not saying the plan was good. I would have liked some more to be done as well.

Just pointing out that the players that we lost weren't all that significant for the most part, and that the "all-in" comment was clarified at the time, and was an accurate for what they've done, so people shouldn't still be confused about it.
First of all I’d argue the “ all in” was referring to resigning our big stars not making big moves in FA.

But we can’t minimize losing 5 or 6 starters without knowing if their replacements would be able to fill.

And I’d argue several we don’t have suitable replacements especially on offense. And we are seeing the impacts as a result.
 
Top