The more I think about it, maybe “soft rebuild” was accurate in this sense - the Cowboys have already been “soft” for far too long. So instead of just a normal rebuild, maybe it truly is a “soft rebuild".
The more I think about it, maybe “soft rebuild” was accurate in this sense - the Cowboys have already been “soft” for far too long. So instead of just a normal rebuild, maybe it truly is a “soft rebuild".
I'm not saying the plan was good. I would have liked some more to be done as well.
Just pointing out that the players that we lost weren't all that significant for the most part, and that the "all-in" comment was clarified at the time, and was an accurate for what they've done, so people shouldn't still be confused about it.