Interesting Romo-Kellen Moore factoid

rpntex

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,470
Reaction score
1,042
Here is another interesting fact - a factoid is, by definition, not a little fact. It's something that seems to be a fact, but isn't. Of course it's being redefined simply because everyone misuses it.

Uh, according to Mirriam Webster and the Oxford Dictionary, a factoid is ALSO...

"a true, if brief or trivial item of news or information."
 

JDSmith

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,273
Reaction score
5,680
Uh, according to Mirriam Webster and the Oxford Dictionary, a factoid is ALSO...

"a true, if brief or trivial item of news or information."

As I said, it's being redefined because so many people use it incorrectly. That is a recent addition because of the consistent incorrect use. I meant it literally, they are creating a new definition for it because of the overwhelming amount of people who use it incorrectly. So rather than having to tell everyone they are wrong, they simply change the meaning of the word to make them right.
 

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
33,538
Reaction score
38,173
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
There is two definitions for " factoid"

If we get derailed by an an argument over the definition of "factoid", this thread will go on to become the lamest thread in the history of the internet

Stop the madness
 

links18

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,322
Reaction score
20,084
Romo must be more ambidextrous than that. He's that good.
 

irishline

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,778
Reaction score
4,213
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
This just in.........

Tony Romo has 114 career interceptions..........to Kellen Moore's 0;)

And more than likely one of those two numbers will never change :p

JK. Sorry had to do it, you like of left the door wide open.
 

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
33,538
Reaction score
38,173
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Here is another interesting fact - a factoid is, by definition, not a little fact. It's something that seems to be a fact, but isn't. Of course it's being redefined simply because everyone misuses it.

Not hurting as much as this pointless post
 

Echo9

Erik_H
Messages
3,773
Reaction score
1,814
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
As I said, it's being redefined because so many people use it incorrectly. That is a recent addition because of the consistent incorrect use. I meant it literally, they are creating a new definition for it because of the overwhelming amount of people who use it incorrectly. So rather than having to tell everyone they are wrong, they simply change the meaning of the word to make them right.

I like how you used 'literally there (correct usage too), considering that literally is the poster child for words being used incorrectly and Webster giving up and making a new definition.
 
Top