Interesting stat

All of Vegas must have been drunk if they favored Dallas, NE hadn't even been trailing in the second half yet.

The Cowboys weren't exactly looking shabby themselves they were also 5-0 and playing at home. They scored over 30 points in 4 of their 5 wins.
 
This is right.
1999: @IND 34, DAL 24. Dallas QB: Troy Aikman
2002: @IND 20, DAL 3. Chad Hutchinson
2006: @DAL 21, IND 14. Tony Romo
2010: DAL 38, @IND 35 (OT). Jon Kitna

He aint beat the Cowboys in 12 years no reason to think he will now. The dude is all neck.
 
He aint beat the Cowboys in 12 years no reason to think he will now. The dude is all neck.

I can think of several.

#1 being that his past success, or lack thereof, is completely IRRELEVANT concerning this Sunday's game.
 
The Cowboys weren't exactly looking shabby themselves they were also 5-0 and playing at home. They scored over 30 points in 4 of their 5 wins.
lol, good point. I forgot that they were 5-0 as well.
 
And it does.

What DOES matter is the state of both teams THIS YEAR.

Care to comment on THAT?

The best team don't always win. THATS A FACT. So if your trying to say the Broncos are the better team put that UNDENIABLE FACT in your pipe and smoke it. Because Smoking is B:cool:elieving.
 
The best team don't always win. THATS A FACT. So if your trying to say the Broncos are the better team put that UNDENIABLE FACT in your pipe and smoke it. Because Smoking is B:cool:elieving.

Guess that settles that. Well done.
 
The best team don't always win. THATS A FACT. So if your trying to say the Broncos are the better team put that UNDENIABLE FACT in your pipe and smoke it. Because Smoking is B:cool:elieving.

You're all over the place, Baddie. My reply was based on your comment about the past meaning something. Now you jump to "present" and make a statement as if I said the opposite of that statement (which I did not).

Of course the best team doesn't always win. That goes without saying. Hell the overwhelmingly better team doesn't always win either. But it wins pretty dang often.

Going back to the original point though... saying "well we beat Manning when he was undefeated like a decade ago when he was on a different team and we only had like 3 players from the current roster so we'll beat 'em again!" is pretty darn ignorant.
 
This is one of the biggest games Romo has played in, in quite some time. Curious to see how he handles it - really, curious to see how the entire team (including the coaches) handle it.

There is one good way to keep FrankenPeyton off the field........ and that is with a controlled running game.

Having said that, we'll probably come out throwing.
 
I think the Cowboys will win or get blown out, we will not lose a close game against the Broncos.
 
You're all over the place, Baddie. My reply was based on your comment about the past meaning something. Now you jump to "present" and make a statement as if I said the opposite of that statement (which I did not).

Of course the best team doesn't always win. That goes without saying. Hell the overwhelmingly better team doesn't always win either. But it wins pretty dang often.

Going back to the original point though... saying "well we beat Manning when he was undefeated like a decade ago when he was on a different team and we only had like 3 players from the current roster so we'll beat 'em again!" is pretty darn ignorant.

I also said Manning was"all neck", let's talk about that. If he didn't have a neck he would'nt be but 5'9''. You have no idea how ignorant I can be.
 
I also said Manning was"all neck", let's talk about that. If he didn't have a neck he would'nt be but 5'9''. You have no idea how ignorant I can be.

o_O

I gotta admit, Peyton gives Merton Hanks a run for his money in the neck category.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,007
Messages
14,506,138
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top