Interesting stat

Pretty sure that same stat applies for winning when Dak doesn't have a turnover, and losing when he has at least one.
 
We have won every game in which this D created a turnover.
We have lost every game in which this D created none.

We have lost all games when we are a minus (give up more than we take away). When Dak protects the ball we win
 
We have lost all games when we are a minus (give up more than we take away). When Dak protects the ball we win

Which is why I don't mind the shorter passing game at times. Now that the WR's are getting more separation and can get the YAC. We do not need to be concerned with throwing it down field every play like many want. Just enough to stretch the defense is fine.
 
We have won every game in which this D created a turnover.
We have lost every game in which this D created none.
I remember McCaffery fumbling near the goal line in the first game this year at Carolina... so this can’t be right unless I’m missing something.
 
Pretty sure that same stat applies for winning when Dak doesn't have a turnover, and losing when he has at least one.

ok so here is the plan. We make sure the D gets a turnover and Dak doesn't. Heck this head coaching thing seems pretty easy :grin:
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,004
Messages
14,505,802
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top