Interesting Statistic on NFL Live...

Section446

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,886
Reaction score
11,526
They were going over the suspensions of Pat and Kevin Williams. To show their importance to the team they brought up the top four teams when it comes to stopping the run up the middle. They were:
- Vikings: 2.5
- 49ers: 3.0
- Steelers: 3.2
- Giants: 3.2

I imagine we might see more of a running attack like we saw against Washington (x2) this week with Hampton in the middle.
 

WG5516

New Member
Messages
1,054
Reaction score
0
You mean the big lead tosses with the tackles pulling? I love when we run those. Colombo is great at them.
 

Section446

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,886
Reaction score
11,526
WG5516;2458663 said:
You mean the big lead tosses with the tackles pulling? I love when we run those. Colombo is great at them.
Yeah, I'm really starting to like Columbo period.
 

Boysboy

New Member
Messages
4,852
Reaction score
0
Dreadnought94;2458648 said:
They were going over the suspensions of Pat and Kevin Williams. To show their importance to the team they brought up the top four teams when it comes to stopping the run up the middle. They were:
- Vikings: 2.5
- 49ers: 3.0
- Steelers: 3.2
- Giants: 3.2

I imagine we might see more of a running attack like we saw against Washington (x2) this week with Hampton in the middle.

Without Kevin/Pat Williams, Jared Allen is going to command alot of double/triple teams...their pass rush will be shot to **** as well.
 

EPL0c0

The Funcooker
Messages
7,657
Reaction score
3,342
b/c CHoice has a little more speed, I hope they use him on those tosses a bit more too
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
75,442
Reaction score
69,877
EPL0c0;2458682 said:
b/c CHoice has a little more speed, I hope they use him on those tosses a bit more too

I thought Choice last game would have a little more success with those tosses than Barber because he's faster than Barber. But it was the complete opposite. I guess it still takes vision to run those tosses as well as speed and its something Choice doesn't have as of yet.
 

goliadmike

reader of rue
Messages
995
Reaction score
0
WG5516;2458663 said:
You mean the big lead tosses with the tackles pulling? I love when we run those. Colombo is great at them.

I'm not so sure how well those lead tosses against Washington will work against Pitt. In Washington they were stacking their tackles and ends in the middle to stop the inside run. With Pitt playing their ends over our tackles and their outside linebackers playing to the outside of our tackles I think it will be hard for them to run the ball with any consistency inside or out. I can see us calling an audible at the line if Tony sees something in their alignment that might give us an advantage, but I'm not expecting a big day in the run game.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,756
Reaction score
21,941
rocyaice;2458703 said:
BTW, what defense does the Steelers run? Its a 3-4 as well correct?

Yep, of course the thing a lot of people don't realize is the 3-4 comes in many flavors. Actually, Cowboys fans should know this with Parcells exit and Wade Phillips entrance. Labeau's 3-4 is different from both Wade and Parcells.

If you remember the Cowboys defense of the early 90s, it was a 4-3 but sported LeBeau's zone blitz tactics at times!
 

Shinywalrus

Active Member
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
10
goliadmike;2458700 said:
I'm not so sure how well those lead tosses against Washington will work against Pitt. In Washington they were stacking their tackles and ends in the middle to stop the inside run. With Pitt playing their ends over our tackles and their outside linebackers playing to the outside of our tackles I think it will be hard for them to run the ball with any consistency inside or out. I can see us calling an audible at the line if Tony sees something in their alignment that might give us an advantage, but I'm not expecting a big day in the run game.

Due to the overpursuit tendencies of an otherwise strong pass-rushing line, Pittsburgh is vulnerable to off-tackle and stretch runs to the left, where their line gives up well over 4 ypc. Right outside runs yield less than 3 ypc, and inside runs yield just about 3 ypc.

There is some misconception about what makes Pittsburgh so efficient in run defense, however - unlike Tennessee, Baltimore and Minnesota, whose schemes and players make their money by stuffing players at or behind the line for losses or preventing the yardage to gain first downs (those three teams are 1st, 2nd and 3rd in that particular category, in fact), Pittsburgh makes its money by preventing long plays.

This is, in fact, a fairly typical characteristic of 3-4 schemes with strong nose tackles - that a runner may indeed slip past the initial line of defense, but run into two clean, unblocked ILBs 2-3 yards downfield. The other teams at the top? San Diego, Arizona and Miami. Still, this is what Pittsburgh does well, and when it comes to preventing conversions via the run, they're in the top 5, so their interior line CAN lock it up...they are typically happy enough, however, to occupy enough blockers to let their LBs and Safeties do the dirty work.
 

Temo

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,946
Reaction score
362
Shinywalrus;2458853 said:
Due to the overpursuit tendencies of an otherwise strong pass-rushing line, Pittsburgh is vulnerable to off-tackle and stretch runs to the left, where their line gives up well over 4 ypc. Right outside runs yield less than 3 ypc, and inside runs yield just about 3 ypc.

There is some misconception about what makes Pittsburgh so efficient in run defense, however - unlike Tennessee, Baltimore and Minnesota, whose schemes and players make their money by stuffing players at or behind the line for losses or preventing the yardage to gain first downs (those three teams are 1st, 2nd and 3rd in that particular category, in fact), Pittsburgh makes its money by preventing long plays.

This is, in fact, a fairly typical characteristic of 3-4 schemes with strong nose tackles - that a runner may indeed slip past the initial line of defense, but run into two clean, unblocked ILBs 2-3 yards downfield. The other teams at the top? San Diego, Arizona and Miami. Still, this is what Pittsburgh does well, and when it comes to preventing conversions via the run, they're in the top 5, so their interior line CAN lock it up...they are typically happy enough, however, to occupy enough blockers to let their LBs and Safeties do the dirty work.

Spot on analysis. I was actually looking for numbers to refute you, but all the numbers actually back you up.

According to ALY (an imperfect albeit useful statistic that counts only running yards in the first 10 yards from the line of scrimmage), Pittsburgh is "only" 9th in the league. They're FIRST in the league at limiting RB yardage allowed past 10 yards (only 9% of the total running yardage against them has come in runs past 10 yards from the line of scrimmage).

They are also 19th in stuff rate at 24%. Stuff% is the percentage of runs that result in (on first down) zero or negative gain or (on second through fourth down) less than one-fourth the yards needed for another first down.
 
Top