Interesting Tony Pollard Stat

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
Yeah, I don't understand that it took them 3 years to figure out how to use TP. 2-3 years seems legit at 8 million a year. As long as Zeke is cut, and we draft an RB. By the way teams like Chicago got plenty of money to burn next year 100m. TP and Justin Fields would be deadly.

His workload has increased each year he has been in Dallas.
 

john van brocklin

Captain Comeback
Messages
40,728
Reaction score
46,129
Saw that TP has 5 touchdowns of 30 or more yards this season, most in franchise history with many games still to play.

Just a quick reminder that:
1) He is somehow not the feature back on this football team
2) Sometimes you should pay RBs (or franchise tag them). This is one of those times
Him not starting is a joke.
I like Zeke, but C'mon man!
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
52,599
Reaction score
98,420
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Pollard makes magic in multiple ways: incredible burst, breaks lots of tackles, shifty as hell. He's been a league-leader in multiple per-play-production stats over several seasons.

In the bigger Pollard picture: I guess I don't know what you mean.
I'm not even saying his success is predicated on the performance of Zeke and the O-line. I think he's fantastic. I'm just saying I'd want an extremely judicious evaluation before spending a ton of money on him, if I were the GM, just as I would want any other player evaluated to see how much of their success was due to them personally.
 

McMicah

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
2,914
I get it. It’s trendy to say “don’t pay your running backs”, and that makes complete sense…. if you make your bread and butter as a passing team.

We don’t. We employ a bus driver QB that requires a running game because he is most successful out of play action. For play action to work, you have to scare people. Anyone watching Zeke vs Pollard this year knows that a great RB can be the difference between a second level tackle and a 40 yd TD. That’s worth the money IMO to keep a RB that scares defenses.
 

Cowpolk

Landry Hat
Messages
19,059
Reaction score
29,036
I get it. It’s trendy to say “don’t pay your running backs”, and that makes complete sense…. if you make your bread and butter as a passing team.

We don’t. We employ a bus driver QB that requires a running game because he is most successful out of play action. For play action to work, you have to scare people. Anyone watching Zeke vs Pollard this year knows that a great RB can be the difference between a second level tackle and a 40 yd TD. That’s worth the money IMO to keep a RB that scares defenses.
That is why we keep both and use them
 

Captain43Crash

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,579
Reaction score
7,827
Define accomplished? Are you saying that he has accomplished what Tony Dorsett or Emmitt Smith weren't able to in a season overall? Yes, he has more 30+ yard TD's than those two, but if you say that one facet puts him in their ball park I will laugh you right out of here. There are many more things they were able to "accomplish" in a season, and a career to this point to say he is "special" with the implication that those two (and a couple or so others) aren't.

I love Pollard and what he brings to this team, he is the best back we have right now. That said he needs to show it as a bell cow, that as you said is taking pretty much every snap, before we can compare him to our lucky history with HoF and near HoF backs (here looking at you Perkins).
It would be EXTREMELY stupid to have Pollard take almost every snap! We have Zek for short yardage situations and to wear down teams in the 4th quarter. Pollard should be getting about 2/3’s of the snaps.

Also, Pollard is Special. Look at his yards per carry over the last 2 years and all the explosive play he has had!!
 

terra

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,356
Reaction score
3,296
I would never make the same mistake twice like we did with Zeke. DONT pay RB's. Now a two year deal at around 8 million/year might be something I might consider. There are plenty of other good backs out there. This is a great year for backs in FA.

Pay the line, not the back. WE blew it with Pollard. The guy was here for 4 years and we wasted him here.
Yawn
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Not saying Zeke made it easy. Not even saying it's easy. If it were, he'd have a lot more TDs of 30 yards. But you can't possibly think that Zeke, the O-line, and the play calling have no bearing.

Pollard is a great weapon, but if the FO we're to give him a big contract, then his production dropped, everyone would be saying how stupid they were not to look hard into why he was so successful.

The Oline has bearing no doubt. Zeke has no bearing at all. In fact, Zeke has had a negative bearing on Pollards career. Play calling? Thats just another Zeke apologist myth.

If there is anyone that has benefited from the coaching and play calling its been Zeke. The FO has coddled him and given him most of the carries when he doesnt deserve them.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Define accomplished? Are you saying that he has accomplished what Tony Dorsett or Emmitt Smith weren't able to in a season overall? Yes, he has more 30+ yard TD's than those two, but if you say that one facet puts him in their ball park I will laugh you right out of here. There are many more things they were able to "accomplish" in a season, and a career to this point to say he is "special" with the implication that those two (and a couple or so others) aren't.

I love Pollard and what he brings to this team, he is the best back we have right now. That said he needs to show it as a bell cow, that as you said is taking pretty much every snap, before we can compare him to our lucky history with HoF and near HoF backs (here looking at you Perkins).

Why does Pollard need to show it all as a bell cow? If Pollard does in 15 carries what these other guys need 25 to do that makes him look better.
 

cityochamps

What Just Happened Here
Messages
6,457
Reaction score
7,929
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
No running back in history is ever "solely responsible for his big plays"
b64ca746-8388-431a-9af3-eba0d99d5dc3_text.gif
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
I'm not even saying his success is predicated on the performance of Zeke and the O-line. I think he's fantastic. I'm just saying I'd want an extremely judicious evaluation before spending a ton of money on him, if I were the GM, just as I would want any other player evaluated to see how much of their success was due to them personally.

Judicious evaluation? All you have to do is watch him play.
 

john van brocklin

Captain Comeback
Messages
40,728
Reaction score
46,129
I'm not even saying his success is predicated on the performance of Zeke and the O-line. I think he's fantastic. I'm just saying I'd want an extremely judicious evaluation before spending a ton of money on him, if I were the GM, just as I would want any other player evaluated to see how much of their success was due to them personally.
We can trust Jerry to make the correct decision for the good of the franchise.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
I get it. It’s trendy to say “don’t pay your running backs”, and that makes complete sense…. if you make your bread and butter as a passing team.

We don’t. We employ a bus driver QB that requires a running game because he is most successful out of play action. For play action to work, you have to scare people. Anyone watching Zeke vs Pollard this year knows that a great RB can be the difference between a second level tackle and a 40 yd TD. That’s worth the money IMO to keep a RB that scares defenses.

How can you be in a rational football conversation and not know what a bus driver QB is?

And oddly you don't realize that most QB's are most successful out of play action passes off a good run game.
 
Top