Internet Providers

Maikeru-sama

Mick Green 58
Messages
14,548
Reaction score
6
Do Internet Providers have a monopoly over certain areas? For instance, if Verizon is the only Internet Service available in my area, does that prevent AT&T from offering service in my area.

I wish I could go back to AT&T Uverse.
 

Avaj

Peace Be Still
Messages
1,700
Reaction score
1
Not here it doesn't. I had AT&T for years then I switch to Time Warner.
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
Maikeru-sama;2858438 said:
Do Internet Providers have a monopoly over certain areas? For instance, if Verizon is the only Internet Service available in my area, does that prevent AT&T from offering service in my area.

I wish I could go back to AT&T Uverse.

You should be able to get any service you want.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Maikeru-sama;2858438 said:
Do Internet Providers have a monopoly over certain areas? For instance, if Verizon is the only Internet Service available in my area, does that prevent AT&T from offering service in my area.

I wish I could go back to AT&T Uverse.

Depends on your location. Usually it isn't the case, but in some places it is. (like mine, I'm stuck with Cablevision's Internet)
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,654
Reaction score
42,998
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
nyc;2858466 said:
Depends on your location. Usually it isn't the case, but in some places it is. (like mine, I'm stuck with Cablevision's Internet)

My area is either Suddenlink (which I have and am happy with) or one of the sats. That or dial ups.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,648
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Maikeru-sama;2858438 said:
Do Internet Providers have a monopoly over certain areas? For instance, if Verizon is the only Internet Service available in my area, does that prevent AT&T from offering service in my area.

I wish I could go back to AT&T Uverse.
I know you can't get Uverse, but you should be able to get ATT's DSL package w/the wireless gateway..

and a separate package for DISH Network if you like them.

That's what both my Dad and brother did cuz they had the same problem when they moved.
 

Maikeru-sama

Mick Green 58
Messages
14,548
Reaction score
6
WoodysGirl;2858513 said:
I know you can't get Uverse, but you should be able to get ATT's DSL package w/the wireless gateway..

and a separate package for DISH Network if you like them.

That's what both my Dad and brother did cuz they had the same problem when they moved.

I will stick with FIOS, at least the speed is extremely better than Uverse.

However, not being able to open up port 3389 for Remote Desktop, not to mention port 80 really bothers me.

There customer support is horrible as well. I just got off the phone with their "premium" tech support and we logged onto my PC to look at my router and I knew more about Networking then the tech did. However, he did say that my port forward settings were correct.
 

Duane

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,063
Reaction score
413
Maikeru-sama;2858438 said:
Do Internet Providers have a monopoly over certain areas? For instance, if Verizon is the only Internet Service available in my area, does that prevent AT&T from offering service in my area.

I wish I could go back to AT&T Uverse.

I just got Uverse installed a week or two ago and talked to the install guy at length. When I asked him about the service being available in some parts of my area and not others he gave me a reasonable explanation. He said AT&T's philosophy was to wire in all the apartment complexes in an area first then expand into the surrounding neighborhoods.
 

Maikeru-sama

Mick Green 58
Messages
14,548
Reaction score
6
Duane;2858546 said:
I just got Uverse installed a week or two ago and talked to the install guy at length. When I asked him about the service being available in some parts of my area and not others he gave me a reasonable explanation. He said AT&T's philosophy was to wire in all the apartment complexes in an area first then expand into the surrounding neighborhoods.

Dang.

Murphy, Tx is a bedroom community and has very few apartments (heck, im not sure they have any).

Besides the occassional channel freeze, Uverse is sweet!!

Verizon Fios is sweet too, but their router seems to be crap and their customer service is even worse.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Maikeru-sama;2858438 said:
Do Internet Providers have a monopoly over certain areas? For instance, if Verizon is the only Internet Service available in my area, does that prevent AT&T from offering service in my area.

I wish I could go back to AT&T Uverse.

no, but Verizon is taking alot of Comcast customers

it's just a plain better, faster, better picture, more content service

apparently with Verizon FIOS tv, you can keep track of your Fantasy Football team, your Facebook status, and see who's twittering (if you're into that thing)
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
AT&T U-verse is still relatively young and from what I understand its pretty costly to roll it out to new areas, so it just takes time. Same with other providers. It's a cost-benefit decision like anything else -- they have to determine whether they can get enough customers to warrant rolling out into your area.

And like Duane said it's easier for them to go to apartments first. Since it's FTTN rather than FTTH, they can get a lot more customers from an apartment using only a single node.
 
Top