Reid1boys
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,575
- Reaction score
- 10,597
The union and the owners both agreed to terms on a franchise tag, when it can be used, and the amount a player is to be paid if the tag is used. The players and owners agreed, that taking the top 5 salaries at a position averaged out is fair for ALL players. This tag protects the players from a ridiculously low offer from a team and protects team from unreasonable demands from a player.
The most important part f this, is that both PLAYERS and owners agreed to this process.
So why is it that if a team uses the tag on a player that they are deemed as evil? In any union, the contract is simply the rules that both sides my pay by... so what is the problem here?
Why do so many of you view the owners as mistreating a player in someway if they use the tag?
The most important part f this, is that both PLAYERS and owners agreed to this process.
So why is it that if a team uses the tag on a player that they are deemed as evil? In any union, the contract is simply the rules that both sides my pay by... so what is the problem here?
Why do so many of you view the owners as mistreating a player in someway if they use the tag?