chargrove said:I saw him listed on IR, so does that still mean he's gone for the whole year?
They could have PUPd him like they did with Woodson last year, which would have allowed him to come back in six weeks plus a 21-day window. The fact that they didn't leads me to believe that he'll genuinely need much more recovery time than that.joseephuss said:The NFL IR rules are kind of dumb. It was put in place to counter teams that were stashing players on the weekly injured lists. Seemed like an extreme repsonse. I think it needs to be re-evaluated during the next collective bargaining agreement. They need to have an IR where players can return halfway through the season and one for the full season. Some guys have injuries that aren't season ending and deserve a chance to help their teams and themselves. From the NFLPA perspective, I would think they would want a union member to have the opportunity to earn more money by returning mid-season. My opinion is not based on the injury to Beriault. I have had these thoughts ever since they put the season long IR into effect.
They do its called the PUP but it has to be claimed before the season starts. You can't go on it at anytime during the season.joseephuss said:The NFL IR rules are kind of dumb. It was put in place to counter teams that were stashing players on the weekly injured lists. Seemed like an extreme repsonse. I think it needs to be re-evaluated during the next collective bargaining agreement. They need to have an IR where players can return halfway through the season and one for the full season. Some guys have injuries that aren't season ending and deserve a chance to help their teams and themselves. From the NFLPA perspective, I would think they would want a union member to have the opportunity to earn more money by returning mid-season. My opinion is not based on the injury to Beriault. I have had these thoughts ever since they put the season long IR into effect.
We could have if he hadn't participated in TC and the preseason games.Chocolate Lab said:They could have PUPd him like they did with Woodson last year, which would have allowed him to come back in six weeks plus a 21-day window. The fact that they didn't leads me to believe that he'll genuinely need much more recovery time than that.
Doh! I knew that! :Yeagermeister said:We could have if he hadn't participated in TC and the preseason games.
He needs knee surgerydargonking999 said:what is he on IR what happened to him
blindzebra said:There needs to be a 4, 8, 12, or 16 week IR; kinda like the DL in MLB.
If you want to head off any shenanigans, just make it illegal to add a player from the IR, without releasing another player. Thus teams cannot put player A on IR, bring him back by putting player B on the IR.
AdamJT13 said:There already is a short-term IR. It's called the inactive list.
AdamJT13 said:There already is a short-term IR. It's called the inactive list.
blindzebra said:Yes, but they are still on the 53 player roster. What is needed is a non-permanent means of handling injured players that will be out 4 or more weeks, but not the season.
playit12 said:I have to agree with Adam here. If the injury is short term and the player will be able to contribute then they will just keep him on Roster and inactivate him. We certainly didn't put JJ on the IR last season.
I wouldn't mind seeing a one time only IR comeback like the PUP list, but then I'd imagine you'd see some abuse of that as well. Namely keeping guys on that IR so that other teams can't sign the for the season. This all on the "chance" that the person ahead of them might get injured. For instance we put Carson on the IR and if any of our DTs get injured in the first 9 games of the season we have Carson to add after week 9. He's kept from signing with another team.