Is it just me, or does every team want the Browns pick?

[TheCount]

This is getting ridiculous, now the Patriots want #6?

Who else? Washington, Houston, Tennessee, Minnesota, Atlanta, Miami and of course the chance that the Browns stay put and select Julio Jones, Peterson or whoever else themselves?

At this rate is there any chance we can land the pick without getting fleeced?

 

[Jenky]

This is getting ridiculous, now the Patriots want #6?

Who else? Washington, Houston, Tennessee, Minnesota, Atlanta, Miami and of course the chance that the Browns stay put and select Julio Jones, Peterson or whoever else themselves?

At this rate is there any chance we can land the pick without getting fleeced?

This could be true. Go for #5, Arizona. :laugh2:

 

[ElGatoGrande]

and that pick would have been ours if we had not decided to go all out and beat the Eagles scrub team... :

 

[YosemiteSam]

This could be true. Go for #5, Arizona. :laugh2:

If Arizona already plans to sign Bulger, they could move back. Though if I were them and PP was there, he would be in the bag.

 

[morasp]

I wouldn't be suprised if we trade down anyway.

 

[casmith07]

I would give up next year's 1 if #5 with Arizona meant Peterson. Seriously. Worry about recouping that pick later.

 

[Mrdude108]

Even Peterson wouldn't be worth two first rounders imo unless you mean next years first with other picks this draft or something.

 

[Avery]

The reason for this is pretty simple: most teams agree that the draft will start at that position.

Newton/Miller/Dareus/Green/Peterson. These guys have likely been pegged to go in some order from #1-#5. The Browns pick is the beginning of how the 1st round will unspool.

 

[Jenky]

I would give up next year's 1 if #5 with Arizona meant Peterson. Seriously. Worry about recouping that pick later.

I'd go this year's #1 and next year's #2, at MOST, to move up 4 spots.