Teague31;5012515 said:It is $2 million less if he is a LB. 8.4 v 10.4 based on what the league just set
ScipioCowboy;5012534 said:In all likelihood, a player is required to play a certain number of snaps at his "tagged" position in order to fulfill the requisite salary requirements.
erod;5012537 said:For sure. Otherwise, he'd claim to be a quarterback. lol
Teague31;5012515 said:It is $2 million less if he is a LB. 8.4 v 10.4 based on what the league just set
rocyaice;5012576 said:I might be in the minority but I don't even believe tagging is a option for the Cowboys. Not that they can't I just feel like its either re-sign him or they let him walk. I think they've seen enough from Spencer to justify giving him a 4 or 5 year deal. I don't think he gets tagged.
Well, that puts me in the minority then, b/c I think the opposite :laugh2:Nation;5012581 said:I think that's the prevailing opinion actually
Nation;5012581 said:I think that's the prevailing opinion actually
rocyaice;5012576 said:I might be in the minority but I don't even believe tagging is a option for the Cowboys. Not that they can't I just feel like its either re-sign him or they let him walk. I think they've seen enough from Spencer to justify giving him a 4 or 5 year deal. I don't think he gets tagged.
StonyRomo;5012692 said:If we were still in the 3-4 I would agree with you, but we haven't seen him in the 4-3 yet in the NFL. For this reason I say use the tag on him for one more year.