Is the 2 Safety a viable option at 24?

tm1119

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,272
Reaction score
9,325
i would love to draft Daxton Hill but in know the cowboys probably wont even give him a first RD grade.
 
I like Cine and his hitting ability, but I wouldn't go there at #24.
 
i would love to draft Daxton Hill but in know the cowboys probably wont even give him a first RD grade.
Don’t be questioning the draft process. They could have an early first round grade on Hill, but they still would not draft him with their first round pick. They refuse to value the safety position ,which is easy to see if you look the past several drafts.
 

Dan Quinn loves Safeties.
- It is possible that could change the Cowboys history of avoiding Safeties in the early rounds of the draft.
 
Because of Kearse? Are we content with Hooker and Wilson? Not to mention they are both on 1 year deals

I think Hooker is in a 3 year and Kearse on a 2 year deal

I think an elite safety can have a huge impact so if the board is wiped out I won’t cry if they take Hill but I’d rather go OL or DL
 
I think Hooker is in a 3 year and Kearse on a 2 year deal

I think an elite safety can have a huge impact so if the board is wiped out I won’t cry if they take Hill but I’d rather go OL or DL

Hooker got 2 mil guaranteed. Little chance it happens happen, but he’s cuttable in camp contract wise.

Plus 3 safeties are on the field 45(ish)% of the time. As Xwalker said above, Quinn loves safeties. He uses Kearse as a LB. Also don’t forget Kazee played the 4th most snaps on the defense last year….
 
I'll take Hill in the 1st no questions asked. He has the perfect skillset for a modern day safety.

Brisker looks good too, but he's more of a 2nd kind of guy. Haven't watched Cine or Cook.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,938
Messages
13,906,089
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top