issac bruce cut

[budsboys]

would anyone here like to have bruce

 

[JackMagist]

would anyone here like to have bruce

I think we are old enough at WR...we can pass on Issac.

 

[Qwickdraw]

He's still damn good.
I'd take him but probably not at his required price.

 

[Clove]

hmmmmmmmmm. I'd be tempted, T.O. is old too, so................

 

[ThreeSportStar80]

T.O. has more left in the tank than Isaac Bruce.

 

[dallasfaniac]

I wouldn't take him, but if I had to choose between him and TO, Bruce in a second.

 

[CanadianCowboysFan]

At least TO goes across the middle and doesn't fall down so as not to be hit and doesn't run out of bounds on every catch near the sidelines.

No to Bruce.

 

[HardHittin'Witten]

just like others have posted... we are old enough at WR. He's still talented and will land on a team very quickly.

 

[bobtheflob]

I bet the Eagles would like him.

 

[Murph80]

Bruce is done. Injured the last 2 years. Really slowing down.

 

[Phoenix-Talon]

I bet the Eagles would like him.

Are you joking or simply uninformed? Several threads started by Cowboy fan have clearly stated that the Eagles are interested in filling the void left from TO; with names like ...

Antwan Randle El ...27 years old

Joe Jurevicius ...32 years old

Isaac Bruce is 34 and injured. While he probably does have some play time left in his career, it won't be with the Eagles!

 

[big dog cowboy]

No to Bruce.
No to TO.

 

[Phoenix-Talon]

No to Bruce.No to TO.

Actually, I'd take Bruce leaps and bounds over any thought of considering TO.

 

[cwbyfan72]

Funny how things change.....

 

[DCBoysfan]

would anyone here like to have bruce

No more over WR!!

 

[Doomsday101]

Bruce a few years back I would have loved to sign him but today? no way it would be a waste of money just as it was a waste of money when the raiders signed Rice. To pay for past memories of greatness is a waste of money

 

[joseephuss]

At least TO goes across the middle and doesn't fall down so as not to be hit and doesn't run out of bounds on every catch near the sidelines.

No to Bruce.

You mean like Terry Glenn? Just kidding. Dallas doesn't have the luxury of signing Bruce at this point. The offense they need to focus on is the offensive line. Until they take steps in free agency, if that ever gets here, or the draft to improve the offensive line, it makes no sense to sink more money into the wide receiver position.

 

[DawnOfANewD]

Bruce would make a great clutch veteran Ricky Proehl-like 3rd or 4th WR. When CAR needed a crucial 1st down, they knew they could throw to Proehl because he never drew too much attention from the other team so he could sneak his way open, and he had great hands so he'd always make the catch. Bruce still has some speed and is a reliable possession receiver with great hands also, and like Proehl he's kind of smaller yet isn't afraid to fight for the ball. He also runs accurate routes and could teach the younger WR's like Crayton and Copper a thing or two about that.

 

[Doomsday101]

You mean like Terry Glenn? Just kidding. Dallas doesn't have the luxury of signing Bruce at this point. The offense they need to focus on is the offensive line. Until they take steps in free agency, if that ever gets here, or the draft to improve the offensive line, it makes no sense to sink more money into the wide receiver position.

Bruce has 36 catches last season he is not what he once was and will never be great again. We can get more out of Crayton than wasting money on an over the hill player.

 

[CowboyMark]

I would take Bruce in his prime, but he is not in his prime anymore. So the answer is easily no.