It’s coaching malpractice to start Ball over Peters

32BellyOption

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,377
Reaction score
4,408
I’d start Tyrone on the right and mix in Peters to spell Tyrone. Keep the left side in tact.
 

irishline

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,880
Reaction score
4,399
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
I watched Peters and he was playing more snaps than Tyron. If always injured Tyron can play then Peters is light years ahead of brittle bacon Smith.

You sound like you are Ball’s agent.

When were you watching because last year Tyron averaged 67 snaps per game and Peters 56. We aren't talking years ago. Peters is now 40, he was in a rotation his last couple of years. Even only plaing in 11 games Tyron only played 100 less snaps on the season (Peters missed 2 to injuries as well). In the below database you have to go back to 2017 for a year where Peters played more snaps per game, and it was only 2 more per.

Again, its not hard to look this stuff up. Stop saying stuff that just isn't true. Repeatedly.

https://www.lineups.com/nfl/snap-counts/offensive-line-snap-counts
 
Last edited:

GORICO

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,819
Reaction score
8,740
Just because some egotistical person vouched for Ball doesn’t mean he gets to start over Peters. If Ball does start Dak demands additional 10 million dollars for playing with only 4 offensive lineman .

total agreement on serious malpractice of coaches to start Ball over Peters
 

GORICO

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,819
Reaction score
8,740
Give young Mr Ball a chance.

Everyone hates the man because of the despicable thing he admitted to years ago and wants him to fail.

He deserves a second chance like others in the NFL get all the time. Mr Vick comes to mind. Its not right to pick n choose who gets that chance.

If Mr Ball starts/plays...I wish him well.

Go Cowboys!

mr dcstar----- i had totally forgotten about his past offense.....i am just agreeing with those who say its serious malpractice of coaching to start Ball over Peters at RT....but lets not get ahead of ourselves

has anyone seen where the coaches plan on starting Ball over Peters?
 

Dak_Attack_09

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,222
Reaction score
3,603
When were you watching because last year Tyron averaged 67 snaps per game and Peters 56. We aren't talking years ago. Peters is now 40, he was in a rotation his last couple of years.

Again, its not hard to look this stuff up. Stop saying stuff that just isn't true. Repeatedly.

https://www.lineups.com/nfl/snap-counts/offensive-line-snap-counts

In Chicago they weren’t rotating him at tackle, he was playing every down besides when he got injured. His snap count is low because the offense he played for couldn't sustain drives.
With the Cowboys every time he played an offensive player scored a TD.
 

GORICO

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,819
Reaction score
8,740
Peters cannot last a full game. He has to be in a rotation. Even last year with the Bears, he would take plays off. Peters is good for maybe 20-30 plays a game, tops. He won't be the solution by himself.

they will have a plan....we must beat Jags and then Sheagles on Christmas eve....and no serious injuries....last two games we have lost to premium starters...Brown and Steele for the season
 

jay94

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,224
Reaction score
1,412
Don't agree in the slightest, this game likely has next to no impact unless Eagles can lose 2 games with one being against us. They need to try and get younger, Peters is 40 or 41 isn't he? Not gonna be here next year most likely.
 

Kingofholland

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,740
Reaction score
7,240
Just because some egotistical person vouched for Ball doesn’t mean he gets to start over Peters. If Ball does start Dak demands additional 10 million dollars for playing with only 4 offensive lineman .

Peter's probably doesn't have the conditioning or stamina to play there all game otherwise it would probably be an easy call.
 
Top