It is apparent to me that Marinelli is voicing his opinion

lane

The Chairman
Messages
13,178
Reaction score
5,557
he will be heavily involved in this year's draft.

i think we will get donald or jernigan if he has anything to say about it.


but after today's signings ...i think we might go after the best available on offense?

maybe jerry thinks he will roll the dice on crawford and bass on the d- line?

give matt johnson one last shot? see if wilcox and heath can put it together?

maybe they will see if hatcher will take a 3 year deal?

then they take the best offensive weapon available?

whether that be on the o- line, running back,qb or receiver

who would you take if we draft the 1st pick on offense?
 

texbumthelife

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,738
Reaction score
23,273
I don't really see any one individuals fingerprints on the moves we have made (or not made) thus far.

To answer your question, I would take the best OL available.
 

lane

The Chairman
Messages
13,178
Reaction score
5,557
I don't really see any one individuals fingerprints on the moves we have made (or not made) thus far.

To answer your question, I would take the best OL available.

martin?

we signed two players on the dl today.

i see a fingerprint.
 

garyv

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,241
Reaction score
1,747
I'm laughing at the Post because I see absolutely no Marrinelli in these moves. These guys that were signed are 3rd tier players strictly to fill the Roster. I honestly see nothing but backup or rotational players so far. Our Draft is looking more and more like a make or break situation.
 

dcstands4

Active Member
Messages
654
Reaction score
98
he will be heavily involved in this year's draft.

i think we will get donald or jernigan if he has anything to say about it.


but after today's signings ...i think we might go after the best available on offense?

maybe jerry thinks he will roll the dice on crawford and bass on the d- line?

give matt johnson one last shot? see if wilcox and heath can put it together?

maybe they will see if hatcher will take a 3 year deal?

then they take the best offensive weapon available?

whether that be on the o- line, running back,qb or receiver

who would you take if we draft the 1st pick on offense?

Does it have to be offense? I think if the Draft shakes (which could happen) and Donald, timmy and Nix are gone were trading out believe it
 

Common Sense

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,897
Reaction score
2,048
Trusting the guy who said we were set on the dline going into the draft last year? No thanks. Rod isn't a scout.

Other than Melton, they drafted some pretty lousy DL in Chicago, also. This blind faith has gotten a bit out of hand.
 

lane

The Chairman
Messages
13,178
Reaction score
5,557
Does it have to be offense? I think if the Draft shakes (which could happen) and Donald, timmy and Nix are gone were trading out believe it

i'm just trying to figure out today's signings.

was it for depth?

or was it to go all out and draft an odell beckham jr. type player to compliment bryant.

i'm a bit confused.

i thought we were going after woodyard....love that name by the way.

i thought we were going after melton as well.
 

starfrombirth

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,086
Reaction score
1,419
Trusting the guy who said we were set on the dline going into the draft last year? No thanks. Rod isn't a scout.

Um 2 things: 1)The DCoordinator was kiffin last year and 2)If everything came together and we didnt have so many injuries that would have been a true statement.
 

texbumthelife

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,738
Reaction score
23,273
Trusting the guy who said we were set on the dline going into the draft last year? No thanks. Rod isn't a scout.

You realize that he was expecting Ratliff, Spencer and Crawford to all be available to play, right? Can you imagine how much better our defensive line would have been with those three guys?

With that said, never take stock in what coaches on this team say regarding talent. They take their cues from Jerry Jones. Period.
 

lane

The Chairman
Messages
13,178
Reaction score
5,557
I'm laughing at the Post because I see absolutely no Marrinelli in these moves. These guys that were signed are 3rd tier players strictly to fill the Roster. I honestly see nothing but backup or rotational players so far. Our Draft is looking more and more like a make or break situation.

who do you think talked jerry into releasing one of his favorite players ever?


was it the way ratliff did him?

was it stephen who is voicing his opinion much like he cornered him about terrell owens?


or was it marinelli?
 

dcstands4

Active Member
Messages
654
Reaction score
98
i'm just trying to figure out today's signings.

was it for depth?

or was it to go all out and draft an odell beckham jr. type player to compliment bryant.

i'm a bit confused.

i thought we were going after woodyard....love that name by the way.

i thought we were going after melton as well.

Today's signing was so that we don't have 19 guys playing on the d line in 2014. Rod M likes to rotates players a lot. These guys were signed to be rotational on the front four. if 1 of them ends up starting it's cuz they worked for it. If you think we are coming away from this week with a "name" your gonna be sad come Friday
 

Iron_Man

KevinU
Messages
750
Reaction score
364
I'm laughing at the Post because I see absolutely no Marrinelli in these moves. These guys that were signed are 3rd tier players strictly to fill the Roster. I honestly see nothing but backup or rotational players so far. Our Draft is looking more and more like a make or break situation.

This has JJ written all over it. Unfortunately, he is destroying our team...
 

CyberB0b

Village Idiot
Messages
12,639
Reaction score
14,105
You realize that he was expecting Ratliff, Spencer and Crawford to all be available to play, right? Can you imagine how much better our defensive line would have been with those three guys?

With that said, never take stock in what coaches on this team say regarding talent. They take their cues from Jerry Jones. Period.

Well, they didn't play at all. Switching to a 4-3 and drafting no defensive lineman was moronic.
 

lane

The Chairman
Messages
13,178
Reaction score
5,557
Today's signing was so that we don't have 19 guys playing on the d line in 2014. Rod M likes to rotates players a lot. These guys were signed to be rotational on the front four. if 1 of them ends up starting it's cuz they worked for it. If you think we are coming away from this week with a "name" your gonna be sad come Friday

i'm not going to be sad dude....i hate free agency.


i believe you should be able to have a keen eye and draft young , hungry players who have not been tainted by millions of dollars.
 

manster4ever

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,021
Reaction score
3,378
I'm laughing at the Post because I see absolutely no Marrinelli in these moves. These guys that were signed are 3rd tier players strictly to fill the Roster. I honestly see nothing but backup or rotational players so far. Our Draft is looking more and more like a make or break situation.

all true
 
Top