It is worth asking: just how special is Ezekiel Elliott?

Jake

Beyond tired of Jerry
Messages
36,067
Reaction score
84,350
Great analysis, now can you break down each offensive line each RB had because it would be silly to not take that into consideration.

Zeke had arguably the best O line his rookie year, that should matter. The overall quality of the offensive line he’s had since then should also be taken into consideration.

I never understand how offensive lines are never mentioned as a very, very large reason for a RB’s success (unless Zeke has a bad game then it’s their fault).

I know this goes against everything you feel, but Zeke gained 58% of his yards last season after contact. It's not like he just waltzed untouched down the field.

By the way, did you discount Emmitt because of the "Great Wall" or is OL only a factor when you believe the RB is a poopy pants and you don't like him?
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
44,740
Reaction score
47,569
Maybe at one time, but not anymore. Especially since there's already a thread asking this.
 

Rogerthat12

DWAREZ
Messages
14,453
Reaction score
9,867
sub-buzz-17075-1494960681-11.jpg
tenor.gif
 

aria

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,543
Reaction score
16,793
I know this goes against everything you feel, but Zeke gained 58% of his yards last season after contact. It's not like he just waltzed untouched down the field.

By the way, did you discount Emmitt because of the "Great Wall" or is OL only a factor when you believe the RB is a poopy pants and you don't like him?

That’s tied for fifth, seems appropriate for the salary he was offered.

I don’t like any poopy pants, they don’t have to be running backs and I question whether Zeke even has a pair of pants because I’m pretty sure he’s still wearing diapers.

Anyways, no, I don’t discredit Emmitt but it certainly plays a factor. We can go all day about Emmitt vs Barry or Zeke vs Barkley but you can’t ignore the difference in O lines and how much that changes things. Do you honestly think Zeke would have had the most rushing yards, even with the most carries, running behind the same line Barkley had for the first half of the season? I hardly doubt it. Would Sanders not have had even better numbers running behind the same Dallas O line Emmitt had? It would be a very reasonable assumption to say of course he would.

They can only play with what they’re given but to ignore the difference it makes would be naive. As I said, whenever Zeke has a bad game I rarely see anyone putting the blame on him, it’s always the O line. Yet when he has a great game there’s hardly, if any, mention of the O line...it’s all Zeke. That’s a pretty big double standard.

Zeke has been about as lucky as a RB can be his entire career. He’s always had a great O line and was put behind one of the best, if not the best in the NFL, his rookie year. And whether people want to admit it or not, our O line has still been well above average overall compared to most of the league. If he played behind AZ’s O line he wouldn’t even have the stats to demand top RB money, probably not even top 3. He could use a reality check just once in his life.
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
44,740
Reaction score
47,569
That’s tied for fifth, seems appropriate for the salary he was offered.

I don’t like any poopy pants, they don’t have to be running backs and I question whether Zeke even has a pair of pants because I’m pretty sure he’s still wearing diapers.

Anyways, no, I don’t discredit Emmitt but it certainly plays a factor. We can go all day about Emmitt vs Barry or Zeke vs Barkley but you can’t ignore the difference in O lines and how much that changes things. Do you honestly think Zeke would have had the most rushing yards, even with the most carries, running behind the same line Barkley had for the first half of the season? I hardly doubt it. Would Sanders not have had even better numbers running behind the same Dallas O line Emmitt had? It would be a very reasonable assumption to say of course he would.

They can only play with what they’re given but to ignore the difference it makes would be naive. As I said, whenever Zeke has a bad game I rarely see anyone putting the blame on him, it’s always the O line. Yet when he has a great game there’s hardly, if any, mention of the O line...it’s all Zeke. That’s a pretty big double standard.

Zeke has been about as lucky as a RB can be his entire career. He’s always had a great O line and was put behind one of the best, if not the best in the NFL, his rookie year. And whether people want to admit it or not, our O line has still been well above average overall compared to most of the league. If he played behind AZ’s O line he wouldn’t even have the stats to demand top RB money, probably not even top 3. He could use a reality check just once in his life.
The Dallas OL wasn't that great last season.
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,231
Reaction score
17,331
I know this goes against everything you feel, but Zeke gained 58% of his yards last season after contact. It's not like he just waltzed untouched down the field.

By the way, did you discount Emmitt because of the "Great Wall" or is OL only a factor when you believe the RB is a poopy pants and you don't like him?


Zeke was first in yards after contact. Zeke was 18th in yards after contact per carry.

Once again an inefficient rusher propped up by volume.
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,231
Reaction score
17,331
The Dallas OL wasn't that great last season.
The Cowboys OL was graded out 8th in run blocking in 2018.

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ol

The Cowboys OL was graded out 4th in run blocking in 2017.

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ol2017

The Cowboys OL was graded out 4th in run blocking in 2016.

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ol2016


This idea that the last two years Zeke has run behind a "bad" offensive line due to injuries is a myth his supporters use to prop him up.

Zeke has had elite run blocking since he entered the league and has been an inefficient runner propped up by volume despite it.
 

Ranching

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,139
Reaction score
107,451
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
As I've done a few times, I intend here to compare Elliott's production in the NFL thus far to other all-time-great running backs to put an historical marker on Ezekiel's talent.

Given Zeke was suspended for 6 games of 2017, I can't compare his first 3 seasons to past legends' complete campaigns. So I will, instead, equivocate the stats from their respective first 40 games --exactly 2.5 full seasons-- which is how many Zeke has played so far.


EZEKIEL ELLIOTT --40 games:

868 carries, 4,048 yards, 28 TDs, 4.70 yards-per-carry, 101.20 yards-per-game --

135 receptions, 1,199 yards, 6 TDs, 8.90 yards-per-reception, 30.00 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 1,003 touches, 5,247 yards, 34 TDs, 5.23 yards-per-touch, 131.20 yards-per-game.


Emmitt Smith had the most productive first-5-years to start a career in league history. How does his first 40 games stack up to what Zeke has laid down?


EMMITT SMITH --40 games:

806 carries, 3,396 yards, 32 TDs, 4.21 yards-per-carry, 84.90 yards-per-game --

94 receptions, 618 yards, 1 TD, 6.57 yards-per-reception, 15.45 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 900 touches, 4,014 yards, 33 TDs, 4.46 yards-per-touch, 100.35 yards-per-game.


Some would argue that Emmitt actually started kind of slow: he was severely underused in his rookie season (1990). Next, let's compare Zeke to the guy who started his career literally faster than anyone else had:


ERIC DICKERSON --40 games:

942 carries, 4,557 yards, 40 TDs, 4.83 yards-per-carry, 113.92 yards-per-game --

86 receptions, 645 yards, 2 TDs, 7.50 yards-per-reception, 16.12 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 1,028 touches, 5,202 yards, 42 TDs, 5.06 yards-per-touch, 130.04 yards-per-game.


Against Dickerson, who had the most rushing yards through 2 seasons to start a career in history (1,808 followed by 2,105), Zeke trails Eric by 509 yards rushing & 12 TDs. He is also 0.13 yards-per-carry behind the Rams' thoroughbred. However, Elliott's receiving-production is almost double Dickerson's (1,199 to 645) and his total yards, yards-per-touch, and yards-per-game are each higher through 40 games than the Hall-of-Famer's.

So let's compare Zeke to a more well-rounded legend, who many consider the most "complete" back of all-time & also came out of the gate strong:


LADAINIAN TOMLINSON --40 games:

867 carries, 3,699 yards, 29 TDs, 4.26 yards-per-carry, 92.47 yards-per-game --

185 receptions, 1,137 yards, 1 TD, 6.14 yards-per-reception, 28.42 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 1,052 touches, 4,836 yards, 30 TDs, 4.59 yards-per-touch, 120.90 yards-per-game.


Against the vaunted LT's first 40 games, Zeke has rushed for 349 more yards, received for 62 more yards (this despite many observing that Elliott has been underused in the passing game until 2018), boasts 0.41 higher yards-per-carry, has scored 4 more TDs, and averaged 2.76 yards-per-catch more than Tomlinson.

So let's compare Ezekiel to his idol, who IS the greatest receiving threat from the backfield in NFL history:


MARSHALL FAULK --40 games:

677 carries, 2,583 yards, 26 TDs, 3.81 yards-per-carry, 64.57 yards-per-game --

123 receptions, 1,138 yards, 4 TDs, 9.25 yards-per-reception, 28.45 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 800 touches, 3,721 yards, 30 TDs, 4.65 yards-per-touch, 93.02 yards-per-game.


Most people would have expected Elliott to put up more rushing yards than Faulk, who was never profound on the ground (in terms of production, if not skill), but be honest, how many would have guessed that Zeke outdid Marshall through the air as well?? #21 pulled in 8 grabs for 61 yards and 2 TDs more than Faulk though the air alone, not to mention outrushing him by 1,465 yards and 0.89 yards-per-carry, through their first 40 games.

Or another great receiving tailback:


MARCUS ALLEN --40 games:

688 carries, 2,841 yards, 33 TDs, 4.12 yards-per-carry, 71.02 yards-per-game --

168 receptions, 1,735 yards, 10 TDs, 10.32 yards-per-reception, 43.37 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 856 touches, 4,576 yards, 40 TDs, 5.34 yards-per-touch, 114.40 yards-per-game.


Let's switch gears here & compare Elliott's career to the first 40 games of five players who many, perhaps most consider the greatest pure runners of all-time:


BARRY SANDERS --40 games:

713 carries, 3,558 yards, 34 TDs, 4.99 yards-per-carry, 88.95 yards-per-game --

81 receptions, 899 yards, 3 TDs, 11.09 yards-per-reception, 22.47 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 794 touches, 4,457 yards, 37 TDs, 5.61 yards-per-touch, 111.42 yards-per-game.

---

ADRIAN PETERSON --40 games:

806 carries, 4,100 yards, 34 TDs, 5.08 yards-per-carry, 102.50 yards-per-game --

65 receptions, 608 yards, 1 TD, 9.35 yards-per-reception, 15.20 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 871 touches, 4,708 yards, 35 TDs, 5.40 yards-per-touch, 117.70 yards-per-game.

---

WALTER PAYTON --40 games:

831 carries, 3,874 yards, 34 TDs, 4.66 yards-per-carry, 96.85 yards-per-game --

69 receptions, 608 yards, 2 TDs, 8.81 yards-per-reception, 15.20 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 900 touches, 4,482 yards, 36 TDs, 4.98 yards-per-touch, 112.05 yards-per-game.

---


EARL CAMPBELL --40 games:

854 carries, 4,111 yards, 39 TDs, 4.81 yards-per-carry, 102.77 yards-per-game --

36 receptions, 179 yards, 0 TDs, 4.97 yards-per-reception, 4.47 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 890 touches, 4,290 yards, 39 TDs, 4.82 yards-per-touch, 107.25 yards-per-game.

---

JIM BROWN --40 games:

821 carries, 4,217 yards, 43 TDs, 5.13 yards-per-carry, 105.42 yards-per-game --

62 receptions, 451 yards, 3 TDs, 7.27 yards-per-reception, 11.27 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 883 touches, 4,668 yards, 46 TDs, 5.28 yards-per-touch, 116.70 yards-per-game.

---

(Bo Jackson deserves honorable-mention in this category of 'greatest-ever-runners', but his stats aren't remotely good enough through 40 games to qualify him for this conversation.)


Or a couple guys who might have been on that list had their careers not been injury-shortened:


GAYLE SAYERS --40 games:

567 carries, 2,910 yards, 28 TDs, 5.13 yards-per-carry, 72.75 yards-per-game --

111 receptions, 1,070 yards, 9 TDs, 9.63 yards-per-reception, 26.75 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 678 touches, 3,980 yards, 37 TDs, 5.87 yards-per-touch, 99.50 yards-per-game.

---

TERRELL DAVIS --40 games:

839 carries, 3,928 yards, 29 TDs, 4.68 yards-per-carry, 98.20 yards-per-game --

112 receptions, 843 yards, 3 TDs, 7.52 yards-per-reception, 21.07 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 951 touches, 4,771 yards, 32 TDs, 5.01 yards-per-touch, 119.27 yards-per-game.


Or perhaps the swiftest running back of all-time, whose frenzied career fizzled fast after a scintillating start:


CHRIS JOHNSON --40 games:

804 carries, 4,072 yards, 32 TDs, 5.06 yards-per-carry, 101.80 yards-per-game --

116 receptions, 860 yards, 3 TDs, 7.41 yards-per-reception, 21.50 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 920 touches, 4,932 yards, 35 TDs, 5.36 yards-per-touch, 123.30 yards-per-game.


Now how about the guy Zeke was most often compared to during the draft process:


EDGERRIN JAMES --40 games:

963 carries, 4,161 yards, 29 TDs, 4.32 yards-per-carry, 104.425 yards-per-game --

157 receptions, 1,466 yards, 9 TDs, 9.33 yards-per-reception, 36.65 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 1,120 touches, 5,627 yards, 38 TDs, 5.02 yards-per-touch, 140.67 yards-per-game.


This is the only guy --as in, in NFL history-- to better Zeke's production in both rushing & receiving through 40 games. So let's break it down. In terms of Total Yards through 40 games to start a career, the top-5 HBs in NFL history are:


1. Edgerrin James --5,627

2. Ezekiel Elliott --5,247

3. Eric Dickerson --5,202

4. Chris Johnson --4,932

5. LaDainian Tomlinson --4,836


In terms of Rushing Yards through 40 games to start a career, the top-5 HBs in NFL history are:


1.
Eric Dickerson --4,557

2.
Jim Brown --4,217

3. Edgerrin James --4,161

4. Earl Campbell --4,111

5. Adrian Peterson --4,100

*Zeke places 7th here with 4,048, behind Chris Johnson's 4,072; and these represent the only men in the 99-year history of the NFL to amass over 4,000 yards through the first 40 games of their career. That's it, seven guys in the annals of this league have ever done that; and Ezekiel is one of them.


In terms of Receiving Yards through 40 games to start a career, of players who rushed for at least 2,550 yards:


1. Marcus Allen --1,735

2. Edgerrin James --1,466

3. Ezekiel Elliott --1,199

4. Marshall Faulk --1,138

5. LaDainian Tomlinson --1,137


Of the backs in these comparisons, all of whom are either in the Hall-of-Fame or merely awaiting Hall-of-Fame induction, the top-5 HBs in yards-per-carry through 40 games are:


1. (tie) Jim Brown/Gayle Sayers --5.13 YPC

2. Adrian Peterson --5.07 YPC

3. Chris Johnson --5.06 YPC

4. Barry Sanders --4.99 YPC

5. Eric Dickerson --4.83 YPC

*Zeke again finishes 7th here @ 4.70 YPC, behind Earl Campbell @ 4.81 YPC


Now, for an examination that looks at explosiveness, let's compare the number of 20 & 40-yard plays, runs and receptions, these backs had through their first 40 games. It's impossible with the older backs, and I'll have to do some averaging to derive figures for backs who played into the 90s but also before 1991 --which is the first year the NFL started tracking these stats-- so the comparison will be more limited, yet perhaps still revealing.


The most 20+yard runs through 40 games of an NFL career (since they started tracking this stat):


1. Adrian Peterson --39

2. Chris Johnson --38

3. Ezekiel Elliott --30

4. Barry Sanders --26

5. LaDainian Tomlinson --25

6. (tie) Emmitt Smith/Edgerrin James --23

7. Marshall Faulk --18

8. Terrell Davis --16


Now the most number of 40+yard runs:


1. Barry Sanders --14

2. Chris Johnson --12

3. Adrian Peterson --11

4. LaDainian Tomlinson --6

5. Emmitt Smith --5

6. (tie) Ezekiel Elliott/Edgerrin James --4

7. (tie) Terrell Davis/Marshall Faulk --3


While these stats aren't available for comparison purposes, it's worth noting that Elliott has likewise led the league in 10+ & 15+ yard runs since being drafted.


The most 20+yard receptions through 40 games:


1. Edgerrin James --17

2. Ezekiel Elliott --12

3. Marshall Faulk --9

4. (tie) Terrell Davis/LaDainian Tomlinson/Adrian Peterson/Chris Johnson --5

5. Emmitt Smith --4

6. Barry Sanders --2


The most 40+yard receptions through 40 games:


1. (tie) Edgerrin James/Chris Johnson --3

2. (tie) Marshall Faulk/Adrian Peterson/Ezekiel Elliott --2

3. LaDainian Tomlinson --1

4. (tie) Terrell Davis, Emmitt Smith, & Barry Sanders all tied @ 0 (zero)


The most 20+yard plays (both rushing & receiving) through 40 games:


1. Adrian Peterson --44

2. Chris Johnson --43

3. Ezekiel Elliott --42

4. Edgerrin James --40

5. LaDainian Tomlinson --30

6. Barry Sanders --28

7. (tie) Emmitt Smith/Marshall Faulk --27

8. Terrell Davis --21


The most 40+yard plays (both rushing & receiving) through 40 games:


1. Chris Johnson --15

2. Barry Sanders --14

3. Adrian Peterson --13

4. (tie) Edgerrin James/LaDainian Tomlinson --7

5. Ezekiel Elliott --6

6. (tie)Emmitt Smith/Marshall Faulk --5

7. Terrell Davis --3


How about reliable? The most 1st-downs (rushing & receiving) through 40 games:


Edgerrin James -- Rushing: 226 -- Receiving: 60 -- TOTAL: 286 *Rank #1

Terrell Davis -- Rushing: 219 -- Receiving: 40 -- TOTAL: 259 *Rank #2

Ezekiel Elliott -- Rushing: 219 -- Receiving: 39 -- TOTAL: 258 *Rank #3

LaDainian Tomlinson -- Rushing: 198 -- Receiving: 45 -- TOTAL: 243 *Rank #4

Barry Sanders -- Rushing: 208 -- Receiving: 29 -- TOTAL: 237 *Rank #5

Adrian Peterson -- Rushing: 191 Receiving: 26 -- TOTAL: 217 *Rank #6

Emmitt Smith -- Rushing: 178 -- Receiving: 21 -- TOTAL: 199 *Rank #7

Chris Johnson -- Rushing: 164 -- Receiving: 34 -- TOTAL: 198 *Rank #8

Marshall Faulk -- Rushing: 107 -- Receiving: 45 -- TOTAL: 152 *Rank #9


If Elliott continues at his current pace for another 7.5 years (bringing him to 10 total) his stats will look like:


3,472 carries, 16,192 yards & 540 receptions for 4,799 yards



I'll take my Hall-of-Famer in Cowboys blue, thank you...

:starspin:
Zeke who? No worries, we have Pollard.
 

Blackrain

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,603
Reaction score
9,220
*After writing the analysis, I realized that I had left Le'Veon Bell's totals off the list.

Here they are for comparison:


LE'VEON BELL --40 games:

730 carries, 3,153 yards, 19 TDs, 4.31 yards-per-carry, 78.82 yards-per-game --

188 receptions, 1,672 yards, 3 TDs, 8.89 yards-per-reception, 41.80 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 918 touches, 4,825 yards, 22 TDs, 5.25 yards-per-touch, 120.62 yards-per-game.

I was hoping to see OJs and Tony Dorsett
 

aaev84

Well-Known Member
Messages
323
Reaction score
385
you lost me at hello.

no one has ever denied if Zeke is special or not. that's not the question and not sure if you enjoy stat collecting and crunching numbers, I guess you do....but

simple question: Do we need zeke to win a championship?

On the field you can see that Zeke has a ton of heart... As does Dak. They are definitely competitors. So talent with heart is what I think gives you the best shot you can get.
 

ChuckA1

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,232
Reaction score
6,908
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Great write-up with lots of interesting info. No doubt the kid can play at the top of the game. Hopefully, negotiations will resume with a mutually satisfying and team friendly solution. Go Cowboys.
 

PoetTree

Well-Known Member
Messages
483
Reaction score
438
I was hoping to see OJs and Tony Dorsett

I didn't include them because they don't really make the cut regarding the "best first 40 games of all-time," despite their aggregate greatness. OJ didn't even record a 1,000-yard season until his 4th year in the league, but then he certainly got revved up for an amazing 5-year stretch of dominance. And it took Tom Landry some time to trust Tony & really turn him loose.

That being said, here are their stats:


OJ SIMPSON --40 games:

589 carries, 2,359 yards, 13 TDs, 4.00 yards-per-carry, 63.47 yards-per-game --

69 receptions, 704 yards, 3 TDs, 10.20 yards-per-reception, 17.60 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 658 touches, 3,063 yards, 16 TDs, 6.65 yards-per-touch, 76.57 yards-per-game.

---

TONY DORSETT --40 games:

684 carries, 3,198 yards, 23 TDs, 4.67 yards-per-carry, 79.95 yards-per-game --

96 receptions, 901 yards, 4 TDs, 9.38 yards-per-reception, 22.52 yards-per-game --

TOTAL: 780 touches, 4,099 yards, 27 TDs, 5.25 yards-per-touch, 102.47 yards-per-game.


Zeke has out-rushed OJ by 1,689-yards & Tony by 850-yards.

Zeke has out-received OJ by 495-yards & Tony by 298-yards.

Zeke has scored 18 more TDs that OJ & 7 more than Tony.

Zeke has a higher YPC than OJ by 0.70 & Tony by 0.03.

Zeke averages 54.63 more yards-per-game than OJ & 28.73 more than Tony.



Cheers!

:starspin:
 

Big_D

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,976
Reaction score
15,048
Dickerson +25 Tomlinson +49 maybe Davis -52 the only RBs close enough in touches the rest of the comparisons don’t mean much of anything. This list would be more interesting to see every modern nfl RB after 1000 touches.
 

Hawkeye0202

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,425
Reaction score
43,126
For the record, I think the major hangup with Zeke deal has to do with his version of market value vs Stephen. Other words, I guessing Zeke and his agent are asking about the Gurley promised money around $15M but Stephen is countering saying that was based on you finishing FOUR YEARS of service. Like we no problem giving you a new deal 2 years out but it'll cost you. So I had to guess, I'm thinking Stephen is likely offering just below Bell money but willing to cap out just above but no way he's paying Zeke Gurley money with two years left.
 

Blackspider214

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,667
Reaction score
15,497
Great analysis, now can you break down each offensive line each RB had because it would be silly to not take that into consideration.

Zeke had arguably the best O line his rookie year, that should matter. The overall quality of the offensive line he’s had since then should also be taken into consideration.

I never understand how offensive lines are never mentioned as a very, very large reason for a RB’s success (unless Zeke has a bad game then it’s their fault).

Emmitt's OL was better and much better as a cohesive unit.

Zeke is a more talented RB than Emmitt and he made plays by himself that Emmitt didn't.
 
Top