It was brady

[TheMarathonContinues]

You're no Cowboys fan. You come here to hate our players day in and day out. Go cry somewhere else.

Glad someone else is seeing it......

 

[Starrlord]

I really hope you don't think that statistics are much more valuable than 7 super bowl championships. No one can be that obtuse.

Rings are a measure of how good a team is, statistics are a measure of how good a player is.

Are you really saying being on the best teams makes you the best player even if you play worse then numerous others? Dont be so obtuse. Bradshaw isn't better then Marino, neither is Dilfer or Johnson.

Rodgers/Mahomes on Brady's teams would hand even more rings, this isn't debatable unless you think more INTs, less TDs, etc helps a team win championships more then the reverse.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Eh? If Brady isn't the GOAT then who is?

I know I'd personally take Aaron Rodgers if I'm starting a team today....but Brady's career has been great and better than anyone else's. But if this is how he's going to play at 44....then I mean you can't really argue his legendary status as the GOAT. I don't like the guy but you can't argue against it.

 

[ondaedg]

I thought it was interesting what Collinsworth said about him being the hardest QB on LB's. His accuracy is unbelievable and his ability to put it outside the LB's reach and within his RB's or TE's while they are running away from him at a 20-30 degree angle is astounding.

He throws as pretty a pass and as tight a spiral as any I've ever seen and Mac Jones is just learning what it's like to toss the rock in windy NE in the fall/winter.

He is the best to ever play the game but he still eats the weirdest crap for a football player I've ever seen. I would change places with him. My love of decadence and bad things for me is my precious.

Ya his football iq is legendary. At the LOS he is looking for a LB to give him a clue and the next thing you know he is hitting Gronk for a TD.

 

[acr731]

Rings are a measure of how good a team is, statistics are a measure of how good a player is.

Are you really saying being on the best teams makes you the best player even if you play worse then numerous others? Dont be so obtuse. Bradshaw isn't better then Marino, neither is Dilfer or Johnson.

Rodgers/Mahomes on Brady's teams would hand even more rings, this isn't debatable unless you think more INTs, less TDs, etc helps a team win championships more then the reverse.

So even though Dak hasn't won a damn thing, he is better than Brady because of stats?

Holy $%$#%#=/.

 

[Starrlord]

So even though Dak hasn't won a damn thing, he is better than Brady because of stats?

Holy $%$#%#=/.

No. I never said that.

I dont think Dak's statistically superior to Brady, at least not typically.

 

[tyke1doe]

Then why aren't his statistics the GOAT?

What stats? You mean 7 rings and 10 Super Bowl appearances?

 

[Starrlord]

I know I'd personally take Aaron Rodgers if I'm starting a team today....but Brady's career has been great and better than anyone else's. But if this is how he's going to play at 44....then I mean you can't really argue his legendary status as the GOAT. I don't like the guy but you can't argue against it.

Rodgers has statistically dismantled Brady his entire career lol. It's not even close. Rodgers worst season is better then half of Brady's career seasons.

Brady being on significantly better teams with cheating doesnt make him better then a player who is literally just better lol. Bradshaw isn't better then Marino.

 

[tyke1doe]

Brady verifiably isn't the best there is, but thanks for playing.

Rodgers/Mahomes on Brady's teams would equal even more rings. Being on the nest team doesnt make you the best player. Bradshaw isn't better then Marino.

Sorry, but "What ifs" isn't a statistical category.

 

[McKDaddy]

My love of decadence and bad things for me is my precious.

A truthful person!!

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Rodgers has statistically dismantled Brady his entire career lol. It's not even close. Rodgers worst season is better then half of Brady's career seasons.

Brady being on significantly better teams with cheating doesnt make him better then a player who is literally just better lol. Bradshaw isn't better then Marino.

I'm just saying the guy is 44 years old and is better than 95% of the league. I don't think we've seen this before in sports. I remember when Parcells brag and boasted by Vinny Testerverde.....if he could only have had Brady at 44......

 

[Starrlord]

What stats? You mean 7 rings and 10 Super Bowl appearances?

Those are team statistics. I'm talking player statistics. Rodgers/Mahomes would do even better on Brady's loaded teams, we know this because they statistically dismantle him whilst being on much lesser teams.

Being on the best teams doesnt make you better then a superior player to you lol. Bradshaw isn't better then Marino.

 

[McKDaddy]

Someone who's numbers show that they are clearly better at playing football, and that if they were on Brady's teams, they would have even more rings due to their superior statistical performance.

Bradshaw is not better then Marino.

Did you know statistics aren't the full measure of ..... anything?

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

There will never be another player like Brady.

Still can’t believe Bill Belichick wanted to replace him with Jimmy G four years ago. Genius.

Last night was elite QB play from both sides.

One heck of a ballgame lead by superstar qbs.

Awesome.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

If you don't think Brady is the GOAT you're probably an Ed Sheeran fan.

 

[Starrlord]

Sorry, but "What ifs" isn't a statistical category.

It doesnt need to be. Rodgers/Mahomes are much better in the actual statistical categories, and so thusly, we know they would do even better on Brady's teams.

Imagine thinking Bradshaw was better then Marino lol.

 

[Starrlord]

Did you know statistics aren't the full measure of ..... anything?

They are the measure of a player.

Rings are the measure of a team.

Being on the best teams doesnt make you the best player lol.

 

[Starrlord]

If you don't think Brady is the GOAT you're probably an Ed Sheeran fan.

Or a fan of actual statistical, on field production lol.

If you think Brady is GOAT, then Bradshaw is second by default. That's a joke lol. Bradshaw isn't better then Marino.

 

[McKDaddy]

If you don't think Brady is the GOAT you're probably an Ed Sheeran fan.

If a 20 year career with half of those ending in SB appearances doesn't convince someone, there is no point talking to them.

 

[tyke1doe]

Those are team statistics. I'm talking player statistics. Rodgers/Mahomes would do even better on Brady's loaded teams, we know this because they statistically dismantle him whilst being on much lesser teams.

Again, there are no statistical categories for "What if" scenarios.

Being on the best teams doesnt make you better then a superior player to you lol. Bradshaw isn't better then Marino.

Interesting argument. How do we determine the "best" team? The one who wins the Super Bowl, right?
Brady has won 7 of 10. Of course, he would be on the best team. And, guess what? He's a part of all those "best" teams. His presence isn't merely incidental.
Tampa could win nothing before he came. After he comes, SUPER BOWL WINNERS! Now the argument is he has the "best" team.
Uh, yeah. Because he's on the team.