Jacksonville - 20 vs New England - 31 **Game Thread**

khiladi;1895477 said:
Uh, Philly was on the verge of victory, were it not for their back-up QBs stupidity... Baltimore was close, and so were the Giants...

You do understand that Philly has one of the best secondaries in the league? Not every team has the personnel to play the Pats the way the Eagles and Raven's did. Not to mention that you just named one team out of 16, and they all lost.
 
TheCount;1895481 said:
That would be some feat, since Sorgi is Peyton's backup. :)
Oops! Who's Brady's backup? I thought I saw him in a game earlier this season.
 
InmanRoshi;1895473 said:
Jags kept the game a lot closer than I thought they would. I thought this game would be over by halftime. Gerrard made a believer out of me tonight.

The Jags are going to be very good for a long time. This is a learning experience for this team. Just need to get another receiver to help Gerrard but the will be very good for years to come.
 
TheCount;1895484 said:
You do understand that Philly has one of the best secondaries in the league? Not every team has the personnel to play the Pats the way the Eagles and Raven's did. Not to mention that you just named one team out of 16, and they all lost.
Patsies beat the Ravens out of pure luck. Plain and simple.
 
TheCount;1895484 said:
You do understand that Philly has one of the best secondaries in the league? Not every team has the personnel to play the Pats the way the Eagles and Raven's did.

You do realize that one of the reason they do is because of the way JJ approaches defense, i.e. they create plenty of pressure up front through creative blitz packages. It is because of aggressiveness up front that makes the secondary better as well.

And the Ravens defense has become old, and their secondary isn't that good. Plus, their LBs are getting way too old.
 
DallasEast;1895485 said:
Oops! Who's Brady's backup? I thought I saw him in a game earlier this season.

It's okay, those are two backup QB's that no one knows.
 
DT101;1895486 said:
Matt Cassell I think.

Da Hammer;1895489 said:

Thanks. I remember Belichick putting him in a game that was already a runaway for one play and he threw an idiotic pick. He never saw the field again. :)
 
khiladi;1895493 said:
You do realize that one of the reason they do is because of the way JJ approaches defense, i.e. they create plenty of pressure up front through creative blitz packages. It is because of aggressiveness up front that makes the secondary better as well.

And the Ravens defense has become old, and their secondary isn't that good. Plus, their LBs are getting way too old.

Alright, I'm not gonna argue anymore. From this point on, all my energies must be reserved to hate and ridicule the Giants, so have a good night sir.
 
tyke1doe;1895461 said:
I just think you should leave God out of it altogether. You know the "thou shall not take the Lord's name in vain" deal. ;)

This coming from a guy who just put a limitation on Him.
 
Da Hammer;1895479 said:
haha ah too late for that.

Well at least the Colts know how to take advantage of a bad defense. Colts should have won that last game but Manning fumbled midfield on the potential game winning drive

I think the Colts have a great chance of beating the Pats.
 
tyke1doe;1895510 said:
Put a limitation on Him? :confused:

Whatever that means. :rolleyes:

You essentially said he doesn't care about the outcome of football games.

He watches and knows everything.

:rolleyes:
 
The Panch;1895491 said:
Patsies beat the Ravens out of pure luck. Plain and simple.
yea, the Raven's total meltdown had nothing to do with it.
 
jimmy40;1895536 said:
yea, the Raven's total meltdown had nothing to do with it.


You do realize, as per NFL rules, only the head coach can call a time out from the sidelines. Even if Ryan called a time-out, it wouldn't count and the referees have a responsibility to not enforce it. That was total B.S.
 
khiladi;1895552 said:
You do realize, as per NFL rules, only the head coach can call a time out from the sidelines. Even if Ryan called a time-out, it wouldn't count and the referees have a responsibility to not enforce it. That was total B.S.
You're right, that is B.S., that should have been a delay of game penalty against the Ravens for an illegal time out.
 
jimmy40;1895567 said:
You're right, that is B.S., that should have been a delay of game penalty against the Ravens for an illegal time out.

Yeah, only in your fantasy.
 
Are we talking about the Ravens game again? How about Tom Brady having the best game a QB has ever had ever!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,680
Messages
13,826,013
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top