Jason Garrett, without fail and as quickly as possible

Back in the day, our oline with Erik Williams on it would go after Suh's knees. I think that needs to happen to put him on notice.
 
how will it motivate him? his own teammates know he makes Conrad Dobler look clean

Again Det players have defended Suh that is what teammates do. Lastly what could Garrett say that would make a damn bit of differance. Come on really, do you really think by Garrett calling Suh out it will change one damn thing?
 
Back in the day, our oline with Erik Williams on it would go after Suh's knees. I think that needs to happen to put him on notice.

Back in the days that is what happened to dirty players guys around the league would go after them.
 
I don't advocate an intentional injury but with Suh, I wouldn't mind seeing it, I really despise him. With his next dirty/cheap shot, he should be banned for a year and heavily fine HC and Lions, imo.
 
I don't advocate an intentional injury but with Suh, I wouldn't mind seeing it, I really despise him. With his next dirty/cheap shot, he should be banned for a year and heavily fine HC and Lions, imo.

I agree if Suh can't control himself then the league office needs to.
 
I agree if Suh can't control himself then the league office needs to.


One day, Suh, with his play will cause a catastrofic injury and the player I hope will sue Goodell and the NFL. Fines mean little to a rich athlete. It's a chip on the shoulder thing for SUH. Short of a year's banishment, nothing will compell Suh to stop his dirty play. Also, like I mentioned before, start fining the coach as well. If a coach, like a parent, cant control his players, then the NFL has little influence aside from piffy little fines. Romo is in Suh's sights. Someone -- AND SOON BEFOR SUNDAY -- has to step up and warn Suh beforehand that he better not cross the line.
 
One day, Suh, with his play will cause a catastrofic injury and the player I hope will sue Goodell and the NFL. Fines mean little to a rich athlete. It's a chip on the shoulder thing for SUH. Short of a year's banishment, nothing will compell Suh to stop his dirty play. Also, like I mentioned before, start fining the coach as well. If a coach, like a parent, cant control his players, then the NFL has little influence aside from piffy little fines.

Actually not a bad idea for repeat offenders to have coach and or organization held accountable. However I think a better solution is multiple game suspensions up to a year. Currently the league has warned Suh
 
Actually not a bad idea for repeat offenders to have coach and or organization held accountable. However I think a better solution is multiple game suspensions up to a year. Currently the league has warned Suh


Yeah. I really hope that Mr. Roger "Safety First" Goodell come to his senses and ups the antie. Half-year suspension and year's suspensions. Come a liability trial, Goodell can at least say "we took Suh's (or other players) transgressions seriously and instituted half-year and year suspensions to help assure safety to our players." That, and not fines that rich athletes can laff at, should be the logical next step.
 
Yeah. I really hope that Mr. Roger "Safety First" Goodell come to his senses and ups the antie. Half-year suspension and year's suspensions. Come a liability trial, Goodell can at least say "we took Suh's (or other players) transgressions seriously and instituted half-year and year suspensions to help assure safety to our players." That, and not fines that rich athletes can laff at, should be the logical next step.

They have a scheduled meeting with Suh and right now they are hitting him with pretty big fines even for iffy transgressions. So I don't think the league is turning a blind eye. If Suh can't get it through his head then the league should suspend him 8 games and then 16 should he continue. He is putting other players careers at risk the league needs to put Suh career at risk
 
They have a scheduled meeting with Suh and right now they are hitting him with pretty big fines even for iffy transgressions. So I don't think the league is turning a blind eye. If Suh can't get it through his head then the league should suspend him 8 games and then 16 should he continue. He is putting other players careers at risk the league needs to put Suh career at risk


could not half said it better.
 
Again Det players have defended Suh that is what teammates do. Lastly what could Garrett say that would make a damn bit of differance. Come on really, do you really think by Garrett calling Suh out it will change one damn thing?


then who cares if he does it. I am sick of having a ***** corporate guy as HC. We need a big mouth who gets in the refs face.
 
then who cares if he does it. I am sick of having a ***** corporate guy as HC. We need a big mouth who gets in the refs face.

Corporate guy? LOL Evidently you just want some idiot on the sideline jumping and hollering and acting like a fool as if any of that crap does a bit of good but hey if your entertained by it then good.
You must have hated Landry
 
I guess you love him taking it up the ,,, from the refs, never complaining and then smiling when we lose. You cannot compare Landry to today, totally different era. Damn the man wore a tie and fedora on the sidelines, that just doesn't happen anymore.
 
I guess you love him taking it up the ,,, from the refs, never complaining and then smiling when we lose. You cannot compare Landry to today, totally different era. Damn the man wore a tie and fedora on the sidelines, that just doesn't happen anymore.

I have seen him getting after the refs and question calls. As far as how a man act that has nothing to do with now days or not. There were men who acted like idiots on the sideline when Tom was coaching so saying it is a different era no there were jerks back then as well and men who keep composure on the sideline like Belicheck.
 
Back in the day, our oline with Erik Williams on it would go after Suh's knees. I think that needs to happen to put him on notice.

Erik Williams would also poke at eyes and grab defenders' necks. A guy like that would make Suh think twice.
 
I have seen him getting after the refs and question calls. As far as how a man act that has nothing to do with now days or not. There were men who acted like idiots on the sideline when Tom was coaching so saying it is a different era no there were jerks back then as well and men who keep composure on the sideline like Belicheck.

I never stated there were not "jerks" in that era, just that you cannot compare that era with today.
 
Suh is already targeted by the refs. There is no need to remind the refs of anything when it comes to that bum.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,576
Messages
13,819,702
Members
23,780
Latest member
HoppleSopple
Back
Top