IceStar-D7
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,715
- Reaction score
- 11,441
I don't understand why Jerry Jones continues to throw shade on Garrett as a head coach but not fire him? I mean Jerry act like he's one of us in here wanting Garrett to be fired but helpless to do so. Jerry by the way isn't looking so good as father time it appears is riding on his back-piggyback style. So why not just get rid of Garrett if the season goes south this year or next. Thoughts?
I was a little hard on the defense Sunday night. I mean you give up 12 points in that dome? That was good defense minus???? Minus the time they gave to the New Orleans offense. That was time our offense could of had the ball. Stopping the opponent from scoring a TD is great. But letting them move from the 25 to 20 or closer yard line isn't. That again is time OUR offense could of had the ball back. I just hate the bend but don't break defensive scheme versus attacking now and then also. Maybe if Dallas had a killer offense that gets a lead early I'd be for it. I'm not counting the JV 3 earlier games. I just wish we had an attacking defense versus a reaction one. Every game it seems-three and out is a rarity.
On offense I just don't see why we didn't use all our weapons Sunday night. I think Pollard would of been better at runningback then Zeke at this point in the season. Zeke seems like his legs are still in Mexico. Pollard also could of been used as an extra wide-out and used in the passing game Sunday. Witten is to slow and old to be running seam like pass routes. Even though he hit it on the fumble. Those should go to Jarwin. And Jarwin should be used more in the passing attack. Just seems at times Dallas forgets all the weapons they have and just settle to run the ball. How about just attacking more? I mean I can't remember a deep pass to anyone on Sunday. We needed to get out early Sunday to shut their crowd up. Take what the defense gives you is ok sometimes. But at other times you need to make the defense adjust. It just seem at times we have a bunch of scared de cat coaches on both sides of the ball. Especially the head cat. Peace guys....
I was a little hard on the defense Sunday night. I mean you give up 12 points in that dome? That was good defense minus???? Minus the time they gave to the New Orleans offense. That was time our offense could of had the ball. Stopping the opponent from scoring a TD is great. But letting them move from the 25 to 20 or closer yard line isn't. That again is time OUR offense could of had the ball back. I just hate the bend but don't break defensive scheme versus attacking now and then also. Maybe if Dallas had a killer offense that gets a lead early I'd be for it. I'm not counting the JV 3 earlier games. I just wish we had an attacking defense versus a reaction one. Every game it seems-three and out is a rarity.
On offense I just don't see why we didn't use all our weapons Sunday night. I think Pollard would of been better at runningback then Zeke at this point in the season. Zeke seems like his legs are still in Mexico. Pollard also could of been used as an extra wide-out and used in the passing game Sunday. Witten is to slow and old to be running seam like pass routes. Even though he hit it on the fumble. Those should go to Jarwin. And Jarwin should be used more in the passing attack. Just seems at times Dallas forgets all the weapons they have and just settle to run the ball. How about just attacking more? I mean I can't remember a deep pass to anyone on Sunday. We needed to get out early Sunday to shut their crowd up. Take what the defense gives you is ok sometimes. But at other times you need to make the defense adjust. It just seem at times we have a bunch of scared de cat coaches on both sides of the ball. Especially the head cat. Peace guys....
Last edited:
