Jerry is still trying to rationalize the Micah trade

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
99,134
Reaction score
251,756
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan

Cowboys owner Jerry Jones on @1053thefan on the Micah Parsons trade: “We’re going to be getting players in the top 30 (draft picks). We’ve got two years of getting Green Bay’s top 30 player. And that should do some damage for us. And then we add that to the picks we’re going to have anyway, and that should do some damage."

“Now, by the way, in between that time, there are 30 other teams other than the Cowboys playing without Micah, this week. There’s ways to play defense and scheme that don’t necessarily involve any player, whether it be Dion Sanders, looking way back, or who it is, a lot of people won a lot of games and didn’t have Dion Sanders on the field for them. How’d that happen?"

“That’s called, you got to have about, minimum, 40-something players to play this game. Between being available with a nick or an injury, plus at the same time, just availability from the numbers of snaps in a game. You can’t go out there and rush the passer for 60 plays a game at all.

“My point is, all of this weighs into the consideration, and it was so much thought out over the last months that we needed an opportunity to see if our trade was there.”
 
To be fair, the media needles and prods Jerry into answering those types of questions and/or defending those types of decisions.

I'm not saying he wouldn't bring it up himself of course because after all it is Jerry, but the frequency, persistence and longevity of the media questions and attention play a huge role in it lingering.

I'm sure Jerry would love nothing more than to move past talking about Micah completely at this point.
 
:banghead:



Jerry Jones: Micah Parsons trade maximizes chance of winning Super Bowl with Dak Prescott​


Published September 12, 2025 12:53 PM
 

Cowboys owner Jerry Jones on @1053thefan on the Micah Parsons trade: “Everybody’s looking for the guy that could absolutely singly make the defense. Everybody wants that guy. Now, we had him for four years, and you see what we did for four years. So, my point is, one guy doesn’t do it.

“Now, the closest thing there is, for one guy to make that much difference, is a quarterback. When you start going from there, then, man, you’ve got to really look at allocating 100 million, 200 million dollars. And allocating that over many players and positions. That’s exactly what I did.”
 
My issue is they lack direction again. They aren't contenders, but the Jones boys think they can be. Getting two potential late firsts and a 30 year old DT doesnt jive. Clark did look good in game one and maybe he has a strong season. In all liklihood he is here for a year or two and then will be gone. It appears needing a DT in the trade back limited their options and now have two potentially lukewarm first round picks. The DT issue should have been a main focus the second the season ended. Not trying to solve by trading your best player.
 
Back
Top