No impact should have occurred. Any side argument about how fast Jones' car was going is irrelevant to me since it is impossible for two vehicles to collide while traveling parallel to each other in separate lanes.
A texting-while-driving argument holds merit for me IF the driver of Jones' car (whether it was him or another person) either: a) rear ended a car in the same lane or another lane, b) collided with a vehicle in another lane of traffic running the opposite direction or c) sideswiped a vehicle or vehicles traveling side-by-side in a parallel lanes of traffic. Texting would have created an impairment leading to a collision suffered by other drivers who were obeying traffic laws.
Unquestionably, texting-while-driving is a problem. It is also a problem repeated hundreds of thousands of times each day around the world without incident. Why? Because a texting driver becomes aware of moving or stopped vehicles positioned normally and legally n front or on the sides of their vehicle. That was not the case in this instance.
The driver of Jones' car hit a vehicle illegally crossing his lane of traffic.
IF the Jones car's driver was texting while driving, it may have caused a split second reaction delay of an unavoidable accident. The video should be reviewed again. The car illegally crossing Jones' car was not traveling 100 or 200 yards ahead. The distance between both vehicles at the time the other vehicle turned illegally was much closer. There are three options available to any driver trying to avoid a collision in this particular scenario:
- Lock their brakes and pray the deceleration will be enough to not slide into the other car (regardless whether the driver was texting or not).
- SWERVE into other lanes of traffic or off the street entirely and pray they do not collide with other vehicles, obstructions, ditches, etc.
- Collide with the other vehicle and pray no one gets hurt.
The Jones car had the third option as its only recourse in my opinion.