Jerry Not Sure Why Edelman Fumble Overturned

[Miller]

Jerry sure is talking a lot lately. Maybe they got him at the hotel lobby again

 

[Direwolf63]

Certainly the evidence to overturn was not clear and convincing.

Had the refs ruled he didn't touch it, there wasn't evidence to overrule that either.

This was a case where the original call should have stood.

 

[The Quest for Six]

Certainly the evidence to overturn was not clear and convincing.

Had the refs ruled he didn't touch it, there wasn't evidence to overrule that either.

This was a case where the original call should have stood.

The video replay was crystal clear the ball never touched him

 

[GenoT]

Jerry sure is talking a lot lately. Maybe they got him at the hotel lobby again

More likely they cornered him on the stripper bus, @ one quart in.

 

[mattjames2010]

Multiple angles showed it didn't touch him. There was only one angle where it look like it may have hit his thumb, other angles showed otherwise.



Watch the second angle. This isn't debatable at this point.

 

[CouchCoach]

Donchya smell a fine coming? I am sure it is frowned upon that other owners question calls that they didn't have a horse in the race. He will at least get a call form the commish.

What the hell is going on, are they just asking him questions because they've got nothing else to do? Hey Booger, who shot JR? Think the Cubans or Mafia did Kennedy?

 

[viman96]

IMO it was clear he did not touch the ball and should have been overturned. Instant replay worked in this situation which is exactly why it was implemented.

 

[glimmerman]

Would it have been over turned if it was us?

 

[CATCH17]

Because it was clear he didn't touch the ball Jerry. There is no debate.

 

[links18]

IMO it was clear he did not touch the ball and should have been overturned. Instant replay worked in this situation which is exactly why it was implemented.

Jerry being all contrarian and stuff...

 

[buybuydandavis]

Certainly the evidence to overturn was not clear and convincing.

Had the refs ruled he didn't touch it, there wasn't evidence to overrule that either.

This was a case where the original call should have stood.

Same with the UnCatch

 

[EMMITTnROY]

I knew that it would be overturned, because Patriots.

I wasn't at all surprised by the total BS roughing the passer call, because Patriots.

I wasn't at all surprised by a penalty like the neutral zone infraction that didn't affect the play and wiped out Brady's pick that would've ended the game, because Patriots.

I was 100% that they would win the coin toss, because Patriots.

I hate that team so much. They're great. But they've also had so much luck, cupcake schedules and playoff runs, teams totally choking against them, they've cheated, and they get all the calls.

 

[speedkilz88]

I saw multiple angles and in each angle they showed his hand on that side did not touch the football. And I was rooting for the Chiefs.

 

[CPanther95]

Would it have been over turned if it was us?

When the other team only punts once, the odds of a muff are greatly reduced.

 

[JayFord]

Would it have been over turned if it was us?

Looooolllll

They woulda awarded the other team a touchdown return knowing good and well you cannot advance a muffed punt return

 

[JustChip]

The video replay was crystal clear the ball never touched him

I agree. And I wanted KC to win so I'm not a NE homer.

 

[Runwildboys]

The video replay was crystal clear the ball never touched him

I agree. Definitely didn't touch...........lucky SOB!

 

[foofighters]

Has too much bourbon effected his vision?

 

[jsb357]

Because it was clear he didn't touch the ball Jerry. There is no debate.

JJ don't want another team with 6 unless it's Dallas.

Cause as soon as NE gets 6, 7 is next.

 

[Little Jr]

Lol how can anyone watch the 50 replays with 10 different angles and come away that it was not clear it didn't touch him? It was obvious