CowboyoWales
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,518
- Reaction score
- 4,754
....and there's the crux of the dilemma, whether to spend big money (or draft capital) on a WR when the problem could be Dak.Any big move for this team has to be “Dak friendly” since that’s the reason they came up short. All signs point to them investing in a WR.
(Here we go again).....didnt the talking heads say that Hilton was frequently 'open' and Dak ignored or was unable to find him?
I actually agree that if we're spending it should be on a WR (provided he's not an older Vet and will still be around if we move on from Dak), BUT I can also see improvements coming from Talbot (given that he's had a year to work on the play book) and Gallup who was rushed back.