cowboyschmps3
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,371
- Reaction score
- 1,880
Carroll- 27
Paea- 97
Moore-58
I know many don't care but I mean thought I'd share.
Paea- 97
Moore-58
I know many don't care but I mean thought I'd share.
Interesting that they are all taking numbers for the players lost, Wilcox, Crawford and McClain.
58 seems kind of odd for Moore.
Carroll- 27
Paea- 97
Moore-58
I know many don't care but I mean thought I'd share.
I think DE's can now wear it. Doesn't Vernon from Giants wear a 50 number?Thanks, I appreciate it.
58 is a LB number, wonder what's up there.
May play him like the do Wilber, can play both if needed.
I think DE's can now wear it. Doesn't Vernon from Giants wear a 50 number?
Crawford never did it, numbers have changed now linebackers can wear 40's like dline can wear 50's.Thanks, I appreciate it.
58 is a LB number, wonder what's up there.
May play him like the do Wilber, can play both if needed.
I think the number rules are unnecessary. If you want a big fat lineman wearing #1, so be it.
Another rule that is unnecessary. Especially since if you report it's allowedI think part of the reasons were put in place for refs to know who was eligible for certain positions.
Moore wore 94 in college for Demarcus Ware. I'm sure that would have been his first choice.58 seems kind of odd for Moore.