Joe Milton vs Trey Lance

[Coogiguy03]

Who ya got, the love for Lance was at an all time high for many on here, now insert Milton, cannon of an arm. As with Lance there were a lot of questions about their game especially if they can read a defense. With that said is Milton better than Lance was at this point, or would you want Lance? I think I'd stick with Milton, who ya got!!!??

 

[DallasEast]

There were never 'many' members posting love for Lance. That is an exaggeration.

 

[BoyzBlaster]

They both stink Coogs.

 

[BoyzBlaster]

There were never 'many' members posting love for Lance. That is an exaggeration.

I'd have to disagree with you here. It was fairly ridiculous how carried away people were getting.

 

[charron]

Zero expectations for Milton. That is the difference.

 

[DallasEast]

I'd have to disagree with you here. It was fairly ridiculous how carried away people were getting.

Anyone can disagree, but the actual numbers do not support the claim.

Right now, it is early in the day. Currently, there are 84 members logged in, along with 1,500 visitors simply lurking.

Scratch all lurkers. On a typical day, way more than 84 members create at least one post on average.

Let's set aside favoritism. It may have appeared many members talked about Trey Lance on an average day. Same goes for Joe Milton since he joined the team. In reality, far less than 84 members on any given day had posted anything about Lance. That has held true for Milton.

Like most topics, a few members are both highly interested in a subject and post a higher number of comments about the subject. That is not 'many'. That is a few or some members who just talk a lot about something. Volume does not always equal quantity.

 

[Hawkeye0202]

With that said is Milton better than Lance was at this point, or would you want Lance?

Lance isn't even on the team
Odd thread ......lol

 

[DallasEast]

Lance isn't even on the team
Odd thread ......lol

True. That's Coog, but should it be classified as odd? Threads are created on a daily basis featuring players not on the roster.

 

[Hawkeye0202]

Threads are created on a daily basis featuring players not on the roster.

True but not in competition with players NOT on the team......

With that said is Milton better than Lance was at this point, or would you want Lance? I think I'd stick with Milton, who ya got!!!??

 

[big dog cowboy]

the love for Lance was at an all time high for many on here

No

 

[DallasEast]

True but not in competition with players NOT on the team......

So, the opinion is conditional? Okay, but I will not hold it against Coog for this particular thread.

With that said is Milton better than Lance was at this point, or would you want Lance? I think I'd stick with Milton, who ya got!!!??

lol. I am on record questioning Jerry Jones' decision to acquire Trey Lance at the time of the trade. All my posts since then reflect that as well. Let's just say... I never had a high opinion of Lance to begin with, lol.

I am notably less skeptical of Joe Milton — as a backup quarterback. In my opinion, New England performed a FAR better pre-draft evaluation of him than San Francisco did of Lance. I think Milton has way more potential as a backup coming in than Lance ever did. Whether or not Milton does will be totally up to him and the coaches--hopefully with as little to no interference from Jones as possible.

Who I got? The same as everyone else, namely the choices this front office makes.

 

[jazzcat22]

There were never 'many' members posting love for Lance. That is an exaggeration.

He needed a reason to start a thread.

 

[America's Cowboy]

Who ya got, the love for Lance was at an all time high for many on here, now insert Milton, cannon of an arm. As with Lance there were a lot of questions about their game especially if they can read a defense. With that said is Milton better than Lance was at this point, or would you want Lance? I think I'd stick with Milton, who ya got!!!??

Brother, the love for Lance was more due to a hatred towards Dak.

 

[America's Cowboy]

There were never 'many' members posting love for Lance. That is an exaggeration.

Not true. A majority (over 50%) were all over Trey Lance the past year.

 

[jazzcat22]

Who cares. Lance is not here Milton is.
We will just need to wait and see how Milton does in PS games. Then will that tell us anything.
We will get pros and cons either way.

 

[DallasEast]

He needed a reason to start a thread.

Some folks do nothing during their coffee breaks. Coog posts threads before, during and after all his coffee breaks.

 

[jazzcat22]

Some folks do nothing during their coffee breaks. Coog posts threads before, during and after all his coffee breaks.

Seems like he is on a permanent coffee break at times.

 

[DallasEast]

Not true. A majority (over 50%) were all over Trey Lance the past year.

Okay. 50% of how many members? The number of members can be an approximation. Post a number.

 

[Hawkeye0202]

So, the opinion is conditional? Okay, but I will not hold it against Coog for this particular thread.


lol. I am on record questioning Jerry Jones' decision to acquire Trey Lance at the time of the trade. All my posts since then reflect that as well. Let's just say... I never had a high opinion of Lance to begin with, lol.

I am notably less skeptical of Joe Milton — as a backup quarterback. In my opinion, New England performed a FAR better pre-draft evaluation of him than San Francisco did of Lance. I think Milton has way more potential as a backup coming in than Lance ever did. Whether or not Milton does will be totally up to him and the coaches--hopefully with as little to no interference from Jones as possible.

Who I got? The same as everyone else, namely the choices this front office makes.

Too much time on a player not on the team to compete. As one would say, what difference does it make if the competition doesn't exist. As stated before odd thread IMO.......

 

[America's Cowboy]

Okay. 50% of how many members? The number of members can be an approximation. Post a number.

3