supercowboy8;4415837 said:
So you don't think a DC has any say about a player that he coaches. Sorry to tell you but they do. Why would they trade a good player if the DC likes him. Why wouldn't they resign him if the coaches liked him? Doesn't make sense. I have never seen a player traded to another team that was good and the coaches liked. But way to reach on something. Ryan also had good things to say about ball and newman. He also said good things about Huff and you dont see him here
Sure, coordinators have input.
But that doesn't mean a team won't do what is in the best interest of the franchise if a coordinator is against it. If Rob Ryan wants to keep Anthony Spencer but Jerry & Stephen don't want to pay him, does that mean Rob wants to get rid of Spencer?
Management decisions don't indicate one way or another any particular coaches feeling on any specific move. I have little doubt that coaches advocate to acquire players who fit their model or ditch players who don't but sometimes players either have to come and go because of any number of reasons.
Throw in the fact that Rob had been there 1 whole season and that team is about as lousy and turbulent at the coaching position as it gets and I doubt they even thought they would have Rob for anything more than a couple of years. If Rob were gonna be a guy who would be there a while and needed time to build his defense, I could see being the catalyst for getting rid of Wimbley.
However, it's just as likely that Rob would have preferred to keep him.
Who knows why they ditched him. He was a 1st round pick and had a couple of seasons that were less productive than you would want from a 1st rounder.
Maybe they had decided they wouldn't re-sign him and wanted something in return while they could.
Maybe they hit the nail on the head at the time but he's improved and now wish they hadn't gotten rid of him. Who knows.
I'm sure the Commanders are wishing they would have re-signed Carlos Rogers after seeing him play this year. I wouldn't say they would refuse to sign him at this point because at some other point in time they didn't want him back.
I'd bet the Chargers would love to have Darren Sproles back.
Hell, I'd bet they wouldn't mind Michael Turner either.
What a team does at point A with a player should have no bearing on point B if that same player can upgrade a position.
I don't think there's any question he'd provide some rush from that side, I just haven't seen him play enough to say he can do all the other things.