KC's game tying goal drive took less time (13s) than Dak's QB run (14s)

Context matters. They had 3 timeouts and only needed a Field Goal. Credit to Mahomes for getting his team into FG range in 13 seconds. But how would he have done with no timeouts and needing a TD?
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
We had 3 times out with over 2 mins left and did nothing with it.

So, yeah. When Dak is your QB it doesn't matter.
Click to expand...

Except for the fact that no one is comparing the last 2 minutes that Dallas had the ball vs the last minutes of the game where KC have the ball. The comparison specifically had to do with what the Cowboys did with 14 seconds, no timeouts and needing a TD vs what KC did with 13 seconds, 3 timeouts and needing a FG.
 
While I was not happy with running the ball and there is definitely blame to assign for that, this argument is absolutely ridiculous.

The Chiefs had timeouts to work with. If the Cowboys had one remaining timeout, the game would have continued.

It was still a stupid play call, but this comparison is a desperate attempt at click-bait and a cheap way to attempt to get followers on social media.
 
Brax said:
Read the posts 3-time outs left with 13 seconds, do I need to draw you a picture?
Click to expand...
This thread is about the last play, not the last quarter, not the game, etc. Just that last play.
 
Kevinicus said:
This thread is about the last play, not the last quarter, not the game, etc. Just that last play.
Click to expand...
Didn't realize you are the thread police, but here is what I responded to, relevant, if you didn't like it just skip over it. Does this help you understand?
Denim Chicken said: ↑
KC also has 3 times outs.
Brax said
So didn't Dallas with 2.29 left and that makes it even worse.
 
Brax said:
Didn't realize you are the thread police, but here is what I responded to, relevant, if you didn't like it just skip over it. Does this help you understand?
Denim Chicken said: ↑
KC also has 3 times outs.
Brax said
So didn't Dallas with 2.29 left and that makes it even worse.
Click to expand...
Yes, because the thread is about a tweet comparing KC's last drive in regulation with the last PLAY of Dallas' game, and how long they took. The poster you responded to was pointing out that it's a stupid comparison because KC had timeouts to call, allowing for multiple plays.

What the Cowboys had at 2:29 is completely irrelevant to his comment, or to the tweet is was responding to.
 
Kevinicus said:
Yes, because the thread is about a tweet comparing KC's last drive in regulation with the last PLAY of Dallas' game, and how long they took. The poster you responded to was pointing out that it's a stupid comparison because KC had timeouts to call, allowing for multiple plays.

What the Cowboys had at 2:29 is completely irrelevant to his comment, or to the tweet is was responding to.
Click to expand...
Thanks officer ken, my point was Dallas had the ball with 2:29 and 3 time out and did nothing, if that doesn’t fit your parameters and you still don’t get it I can’t help you. You can always lodge a official complaint with admin if if bothers you so much. SMH lol
 
Brax said:
Thanks officer ken, my point was Dallas had the ball with 2:29 and 3 time out and did nothing, if that doesn’t fit your parameters and you still don’t get it I can’t help you. You can always lodge a official complaint with admin if if bothers you so much. SMH lol
Click to expand...
It's an asinine "point" that had nothing to do with the discussion.
 
Brax said:
If you say so and don’t get it oh well not much hope for you. Good night chuckles.
Click to expand...

I'll give you a chance, since you're clearly not understanding things well.

Can you explain the relevance of your "point" to the thread?

To help you out, I'll inform you that the point of the tweet was to try and make the scramble look worse because the Chiefs were able to go 40+ yards and kick a field goal in the time it took the Cowboys to run one play (and run out of time). The point of the comment you replied to, was to point out that it was a poor logical argument, because the Chiefs had 3 timeouts and could stop the clock after each play, whereas the Cowboys had none - of course a team that can stop the clock at will is going to get more plays off.

I eagerly anticipate your explanation of how your post had to do with anything this thread is about, or is at the very least relevant to the post you replied to. You went and quoted that post and your response in a reply to me, so I can only infer that you feel there is some connection between the two. If I have erred in that inference, and you really were just randomly quoting others and posting random information for giggles, then my apologies.
 
Romo_To_Dez said:
Except for the fact that no one is comparing the last 2 minutes that Dallas had the ball vs the last minutes of the game where KC have the ball. The comparison specifically had to do with what the Cowboys did with 14 seconds, no timeouts and needing a TD vs what KC did with 13 seconds, 3 timeouts and needing a FG.
Click to expand...
What you are shocked Dak Hater @MountaineerCowboy is Goal Post Shifting?:lmao2::lmao2:
 
Brax said:
Thanks officer ken, my point was Dallas had the ball with 2:29 and 3 time out and did nothing, if that doesn’t fit your parameters and you still don’t get it I can’t help you. You can always lodge a official complaint with admin if if bothers you so much. SMH lol
Click to expand...
Or you could start your own Dak Hate Thread....but Dak Haters defecate everywhere!!:lmao2::lmao2:
 
Qcard said:
Or you could start your own Dak Hate Thread....but Dak Haters defecate everywhere!!:lmao2::lmao2:
Click to expand...
You are most likely covered with it and it's a good place for it. Sad the low reading ability here with some like you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 7,415 (members: 64, guests: 7,351)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,673
Messages
13,825,683
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top