Beaker42
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,093
- Reaction score
- 7,403
Shoot, we might need to take him at 10......Agreed. I kind of hope he's available at 44
Shoot, we might need to take him at 10......Agreed. I kind of hope he's available at 44
LOL - none of them. He gets their 1 then CeeDee and Coop and Gallup have career days.To effectively use Pitts you got to line him up all over the field to create mismatches. Problem is, who are you taking off the field: Cooper, Lamb, Gallup to do this?
Agreed. I kind of hope he's available at 44
Shoot, we might need to take him at 10......
Yeah I'd have to dig out my old books but I'm pretty positive he had Manning at 1. I know this because I had Leaf over Manning.
Biggest miss I've ever made obviously but how the heck was I supposed to know how immature he was back then? It wasn't like the coverage we have today.
That's because most of what he did in college is just what WRs do in the NFL.Please define “same thing” because I’m positive none of the 42 TE’s on our roster can do the “same thing” as Pitts.
No he did his top 25 last Saturday on his ESPN radio show. It was Elway and then Manning. He admitted the Leaf whiff but he had two bigger ones. Andre Ware and Heath Schuler.Yeah I'd have to dig out my old books but I'm pretty positive he had Manning at 1. I know this because I had Leaf over Manning.
Biggest miss I've ever made obviously but how the heck was I supposed to know how immature he was back then? It wasn't like the coverage we have today.
No he did his top 25 last Saturday on his ESPN radio show. It was Elway and then Manning. He admitted the Leaf whiff but he had two bigger ones. Andre Ware and Heath Schuler.
Let's don't get carried away, he isn't the #1 receiving option if he were on the Cowboys.LOL - none of them. He gets their 1 then CeeDee and Coop and Gallup have career days.
How do you know? As inaccurate as Dak is this kid’s right up his alley. Catches everything. You are aware we led the entire league in drops??Let's don't get carried away, he isn't the #1 receiving option if he were on the Cowboys.
Pitts is basically a big receiver, he is good, but not a #1 receiver on a team like the Cowboys.How do you know? As inaccurate as Dak is this kid’s right up his alley. Catches everything. You are aware we led the entire league in drops??
Good pointIf he’s that good, Bill already knows all about it from his buddy Nick and he will go at 15.
I would.
None of the above.To effectively use Pitts you got to line him up all over the field to create mismatches. Problem is, who are you taking off the field: Cooper, Lamb, Gallup to do this?
Really does depend on how this contract situation goes. If we still can't reach a long-term deal with Dak, we've got to consider QB. And of all the QBs that might be available at 10--Jones, Lance, Fields--Jones is the only one I seriously consider
You wouldn't need to with Pitts being the TE assuming they are in a 1 back set. If you are moving him outside against a CB you aren't running and have no need for another TE inside and if you did sub in another TE you would just be letting the defense sub in to counteract the mismatch.To effectively use Pitts you got to line him up all over the field to create mismatches. Problem is, who are you taking off the field: Cooper, Lamb, Gallup to do this?
Then teams bring on another corner, where the TE inline, may have another linebacker to protect against the run.You wouldn't need to with Pitts being the TE assuming they are in a 1 back set. If you are moving him outside against a CB you aren't running and have no need for another TE inside and if you did sub in another TE you would just be letting the defense sub in to counteract the mismatch.
To effectively use Pitts you got to line him up all over the field to create mismatches. Problem is, who are you taking off the field: Cooper, Lamb, Gallup to do this?