Kiper - Re-grading the 2015 Draft

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
98,954
Reaction score
250,909
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Gives us the worst re-grade in the division. Even talks about how bad Cowboys fans are but I'll leave that out of this as it was a bit of a low blow, even if he's got a point.

Shout out to Will McClay.

http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draf...r-hands-new-grades-every-2015-nfl-draft-class

Dallas Cowboys
Post-draft grade: C+

Byron Jones was a player I really liked, and he played well for a rookie. He really carries the grade. Randy Gregory is a talent, but I said then they were rolling the dice by taking him that early. They haven't gotten anything from him yet. Still a work in progress. There's nothing to write home about after that, and the team really fell off, with QB health the big culprit. I questioned not taking a running back anywhere, and I still think that's a legitimate concern. I should remind people that La'el Collins doesn't factor in here as he wasn't a part of this draft class, and could have been signed by anybody.

New grade: C

-

New York Giants
Post-draft grade: B-

I know Ereck Flowers was able to step in this season, but he struggled for the most part. I wrote then: "While the pick made sense, I had Flowers at No. 27 overall on my final Big Board, so for me this wasn't a 'best player available' situation." In a nutshell, the Giants reached on Flowers and have to hope he develops into the kind of player that can stick at left tackle. I see that as a major question. Landon Collins is a good player I think people need to be patient with given all that he was asked to do. After those two, it's hard to say who could break through based on early returns. Again, I saw Flowers as a first-rounder; I just thought it was a bit rich that early.

New grade: C+

-

Philadelphia Eagles
Post-draft grade: B+

Here's a draft class that could look a whole lot better in a couple years than it does right now. Start with Nelson Agholor, a talented kid who was just way too inconsistent in 2015 and is going to get better; or Eric Rowe, who had a tough transition, but could get much better. Then there's Jordan Hicks, who was outstanding until he got hurt. There's also JaCorey Shepherd, who I thought could have played immediately in nickel looks but got hurt. Based on where things are now, the class doesn't look so great, but there's a lot of potential.

New grade: C+

-

Washington Commanders
Post-draft grade: A-

I loved this class at the time. I wrote: "Everywhere you look, they got tougher. Overall, I was really impressed with this draft." Not only did they get tougher, but the rookies rubbed off on other players and the team got tougher overall. Brandon Scherff had to be good at guard given that draft slot, and he settled down and played well. Preston Smith showed he's going to be a big part of that defense going forward, and Jamison Crowder was a reliable target. Matt Jones had his moments and will in the future. Kyshoen Jarrett was a nice get late, and don't forget undrafted Quinton Dunbar. There's more to talk about with this class, but in short, it was really good.

New grade: A
 
Dallas Cowboys
Post-draft grade:
C+

Byron Jones was a player I really liked, and he played well for a rookie. He really carries the grade. Randy Gregory is a talent, but I said then they were rolling the dice by taking him that early. They haven't gotten anything from him yet. Still a work in progress. There's nothing to write home about after that, and the team really fell off, with QB health the big culprit. I questioned not taking a running back anywhere, and I still think that's a legitimate concern. I should remind people that La'el Collins doesn't factor in here as he wasn't a part of this draft class, and could have been signed by anybody.

New grade: C

Seattle Seahawks

Post-draft grade: A-

Throw me a bone here. I wrote after the draft: "The pick of Tyler Lockett (they moved up for him) is one of my favorites in the entire draft. The guy is just always open, and anybody who watched the Super Bowl knows how much the Seahawks need pass-catchers who can create some separation." Lockett has been everything they hoped for, and will be a big part of things in years to come. Steal. And if you don't like the Jimmy Graham trade now, just remember that Thomas Rawls is part of this class (undrafted pickup) and might have beaten Gurley for the rookie rushing title had he stayed healthy. Frank Clark showed flashes of major potential this season, and figures to be a big part of the defensive front next year. It's relatively quiet after that, but again: major contributions to a winning team. Draft still looks good.

New grade: A

--

Oh, don't worry. He will hear about this.
 
That is a pretty fair grade considering we got nothing from so many of our picks yet.
 
The Commanders really had a nice draft. I guess that new GM is legit.

Bad things man.
 
Yeah could have been signed by anyone.

But he was signed by Dallas.

Which is fair enough cause he wasn't actually drafted. But either say nothing, cause he's obviously talking about the drafted players, or simply point out it's only because he wasn't drafted.

Otherwise I have no problem with the grade. Jones showed great promise. Gregory never really got going due to injuries. Who knows if he will get going.
 
Dallas Cowboys
Post-draft grade:
C+

Byron Jones was a player I really liked, and he played well for a rookie. He really carries the grade. Randy Gregory is a talent, but I said then they were rolling the dice by taking him that early. They haven't gotten anything from him yet. Still a work in progress. There's nothing to write home about after that, and the team really fell off, with QB health the big culprit. I questioned not taking a running back anywhere, and I still think that's a legitimate concern. I should remind people that La'el Collins doesn't factor in here as he wasn't a part of this draft class, and could have been signed by anybody.

New grade: C
Seattle Seahawks
Post-draft grade: A-

Throw me a bone here. I wrote after the draft: "The pick of Tyler Lockett (they moved up for him) is one of my favorites in the entire draft. The guy is just always open, and anybody who watched the Super Bowl knows how much the Seahawks need pass-catchers who can create some separation." Lockett has been everything they hoped for, and will be a big part of things in years to come. Steal. And if you don't like the Jimmy Graham trade now, just remember that Thomas Rawls is part of this class (undrafted pickup) and might have beaten Gurley for the rookie rushing title had he stayed healthy. Frank Clark showed flashes of major potential this season, and figures to be a big part of the defensive front next year. It's relatively quiet after that, but again: major contributions to a winning team. Draft still looks good.

New grade: A

--

Oh, don't worry. He will hear about this.

Well spotted.

There's nothing like consistency and this is nothing like consistency.
 
Randy Gregory is a talent, but I said then they were rolling the dice by taking him that early.

I understand that he had a disappointing rookie campaign, but this is a ridiculous statement considering he was projected as a top 10 - 15 talent.
 
Washington Commanders
Post-draft grade: A-

I loved this class at the time. I wrote: "Everywhere you look, they got tougher. Overall, I was really impressed with this draft." Not only did they get tougher, but the rookies rubbed off on other players and the team got tougher overall. Brandon Scherff had to be good at guard given that draft slot, and he settled down and played well. Preston Smith showed he's going to be a big part of that defense going forward, and Jamison Crowder was a reliable target. Matt Jones had his moments and will in the future. Kyshoen Jarrett was a nice get late, and don't forget undrafted Quinton Dunbar. There's more to talk about with this class, but in short, it was really good.

New grade: A

Even within the division there is a double standard.

This is me just nitpicking some poor professional work. I don't really care what Mel thinks about the draft, especially after the fact. I can evaluate that just about as well as he can in hindsight.
 
I agree with Mel's grade. I also agree Collins best player they aquired last year doesnt count. Why does he try and and add undrafted FA to the 4skins draft though?
 
Dallas Cowboys
Post-draft grade:
C+

Byron Jones was a player I really liked, and he played well for a rookie. He really carries the grade. Randy Gregory is a talent, but I said then they were rolling the dice by taking him that early. They haven't gotten anything from him yet. Still a work in progress. There's nothing to write home about after that, and the team really fell off, with QB health the big culprit. I questioned not taking a running back anywhere, and I still think that's a legitimate concern. I should remind people that La'el Collins doesn't factor in here as he wasn't a part of this draft class, and could have been signed by anybody.

New grade: C
Seattle Seahawks
Post-draft grade: A-

Throw me a bone here. I wrote after the draft: "The pick of Tyler Lockett (they moved up for him) is one of my favorites in the entire draft. The guy is just always open, and anybody who watched the Super Bowl knows how much the Seahawks need pass-catchers who can create some separation." Lockett has been everything they hoped for, and will be a big part of things in years to come. Steal. And if you don't like the Jimmy Graham trade now, just remember that Thomas Rawls is part of this class (undrafted pickup) and might have beaten Gurley for the rookie rushing title had he stayed healthy. Frank Clark showed flashes of major potential this season, and figures to be a big part of the defensive front next year. It's relatively quiet after that, but again: major contributions to a winning team. Draft still looks good.

New grade: A

--

Oh, don't worry. He will hear about this.

Your snark should be better served on your homie mel after he said this...

is a talent, but I said then they were rolling the dice by taking him that early

al.jpeg


Mel Mel Mel Mel
 
Dallas Cowboys
Post-draft grade: C+

Byron Jones was a player I really liked, and he played well for a rookie. He really carries the grade. Randy Gregory is a talent, but I said then they were rolling the dice by taking him that early. They haven't gotten anything from him yet. Still a work in progress. There's nothing to write home about after that, and the team really fell off, with QB health the big culprit. I questioned not taking a running back anywhere, and I still think that's a legitimate concern. I should remind people that La'el Collins doesn't factor in here as he wasn't a part of this draft class, and could have been signed by anybody.

New grade: C

The problem is we took Gregory too early? Uh-huh. Thanks Mel.
 
Dallas Cowboys
Post-draft grade:
C+

Byron Jones was a player I really liked, and he played well for a rookie. He really carries the grade. Randy Gregory is a talent, but I said then they were rolling the dice by taking him that early. They haven't gotten anything from him yet. Still a work in progress. There's nothing to write home about after that, and the team really fell off, with QB health the big culprit. I questioned not taking a running back anywhere, and I still think that's a legitimate concern. I should remind people that La'el Collins doesn't factor in here as he wasn't a part of this draft class, and could have been signed by anybody.

New grade: C
Seattle Seahawks
Post-draft grade: A-

Throw me a bone here. I wrote after the draft: "The pick of Tyler Lockett (they moved up for him) is one of my favorites in the entire draft. The guy is just always open, and anybody who watched the Super Bowl knows how much the Seahawks need pass-catchers who can create some separation." Lockett has been everything they hoped for, and will be a big part of things in years to come. Steal. And if you don't like the Jimmy Graham trade now, just remember that Thomas Rawls is part of this class (undrafted pickup) and might have beaten Gurley for the rookie rushing title had he stayed healthy. Frank Clark showed flashes of major potential this season, and figures to be a big part of the defensive front next year. It's relatively quiet after that, but again: major contributions to a winning team. Draft still looks good.

New grade: A

--

Oh, don't worry. He will hear about this.

Nice catch. So give the Seahawks credit for their undrafted free agent acquisition but not us. :rolleyes:

Anything to piss off Cowboys fans and start the letter-writing/social media campaign.

P-R-E-D-I-C-T-A-B-L-E
 
Dallas Cowboys
Post-draft grade:
C+

Byron Jones was a player I really liked, and he played well for a rookie. He really carries the grade. Randy Gregory is a talent, but I said then they were rolling the dice by taking him that early. They haven't gotten anything from him yet. Still a work in progress. There's nothing to write home about after that, and the team really fell off, with QB health the big culprit. I questioned not taking a running back anywhere, and I still think that's a legitimate concern. I should remind people that La'el Collins doesn't factor in here as he wasn't a part of this draft class, and could have been signed by anybody.

New grade: C
Seattle Seahawks
Post-draft grade: A-

Throw me a bone here. I wrote after the draft: "The pick of Tyler Lockett (they moved up for him) is one of my favorites in the entire draft. The guy is just always open, and anybody who watched the Super Bowl knows how much the Seahawks need pass-catchers who can create some separation." Lockett has been everything they hoped for, and will be a big part of things in years to come. Steal. And if you don't like the Jimmy Graham trade now, just remember that Thomas Rawls is part of this class (undrafted pickup) and might have beaten Gurley for the rookie rushing title had he stayed healthy. Frank Clark showed flashes of major potential this season, and figures to be a big part of the defensive front next year. It's relatively quiet after that, but again: major contributions to a winning team. Draft still looks good.

New grade: A

--

Oh, don't worry. He will hear about this.

So Seattle gets credit for Rawls, but Dallas doesn't get credit for Collins. Makes sense.
 
Don't have a problem with the grade...but rather the inconsistencies.

Collins doesn't count...but then he mentions undrafted players Rawls for Seattle & Dunbar for Washington.

He said Dallas was "rolling the dice" by taking Gregory that early (2nd round)...and perhaps some of that was based on the off-field issues. But he repeatedly had Gregory ranked in his top 7 players overall, whether it be his top 10 list, big board, or mock drafts.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,011
Messages
14,506,480
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top