Leadership: In My Humble Opinion

casmith07

Attorney-at-Zone
Messages
31,539
Reaction score
9,313
What Is Leadership?

I joined this site in October 2008 in the middle of what turned out to be a somewhat circus of a season for the Cowboys – we had Terrell Owens, Adam “Pacman” Jones, and Tank Johnson on the team, and we also had Jerry Jones making the fan-favorite trade for Roy Williams at the trading deadline to attempt to get us over the hump. One of the things that I have seen argued about by fans on this website in the last two years has been leadership. Everyone here loves to throw around the word leadership in different contexts – is [player] a leader? We need some leadership on offense/defense. [Player] is not a vocal leader, he should be getting in people’s faces! While I have usually argued what leadership is in bits and pieces here and there, I figured that I would take a good look at what I think it is from my perspective.

As a Military Officer, leadership is a concept that you encounter throughout all of your training. Whether you are at a service academy, in an ROTC program at a college or university, or a prior-Enlisted Soldier going through the rigors of the Officer Candidate School, you will encounter some form of training, seminar, briefing, or class on “leadership.” But what is it?

From an Army standpoint, as that is what I am mostly familiar with, “competent leaders of character are necessary for the Army to meet the challenges in the dangerous and complex security environment we face.” Additionally, we are strong advocates of the BE-KNOW-DO model for leadership. Army leaders set the example, teach, and mentor – Field Manual 6-22, Army Leadership, has four parts that try to put this intangible quality into a tangible source. Out of all of those, I think the best example of what to look for is in Chapter 2 – Leadership Requirements Model. At the risk of sounding too military, I will try to put these as close to football terms as I can.

The Leadership Requirements Model has two main avenues – Attributes and Core Competencies.

Attributes include being a leader of character (values, empathy, and the warrior ethos), a leader with presence (having good bearing, being physically fit, composed, confident, and resilient), and having intellectual capacity (mental agility, sound judgment, innovation, interpersonal tact, and domain knowledge).

Core Competencies include leading (leading others, extending your influence, leading by example, communicating), developing (creating a positive environment, preparing oneself, developing others) and achieves – basically, gets results.

Now, in thinking about football players on the Dallas Cowboys, both past and present, who fits these molds?

Troy Aikman – high values, empathy for teammates, a warrior spirit, physically and mentally fit, always composed and confident, resilient and tough, master of his domain, innovative, achieves results.

Tony Romo – high values, empathy for teammates, a warrior spirit, physically and mentally fit, always composed and confident, resilient and tough, master of his domain, innovative, achieves results.

Basically, what a leader does is he inspires others around him to be their best, and to want to be their best for the greater good of the organization. I think that goes without saying for Cowboys legends such as Roger Staubach, Tom Landry, Jimmy Johnson, Troy Aikman, Michael Irvin, Emmitt Smith and others. I also think it goes without saying for current greats like Tony Romo, DeMarcus Ware, Terence Newman, Bradie James, Jason Witten, Miles Austin and Jay Ratliff.

Where I am conflicted on this is with the chain of command on the coaching staff. I do not think that Wade Phillips possesses all of the traits necessary to be a sound leader. Now, this is not a knock on him as a person, as I do believe he possesses some if not many of the traits, namely a person of high character and someone who empathizes and is arguably a master of his domain. But I think he falls short in some that weigh more heavily than others, such as his innovation, resiliency and toughness, and the warrior spirit.

The question is – does Jason Garrett possess these qualities? I think we can unquestionably say that he possesses some, and the others remain to be seen. Character, values, empathy, and the achievement of results are all there. I think the others, namely the warrior spirit, resiliency and toughness, and innovation cannot be seen because he refuses to overstep his boundary as a “follower” to the head coach, Wade Phillips.

Bottom line: give Jason Garrett a shot. Sometimes an Army’s best leaders are those that hunger for a chance to prove they have the warrior ethos, resiliency, and toughness to inspire their Soldiers to do extraordinary things.

In my humble opinion, of course. ;)
 
Nice opening statements. Enjoyed and was aroused by the presentments that proceeded. But, as with all cases at law, they have to be adjudged upon the merits and specifications as they are presented, defined, and then taken to task in compliance with elements of proof to sustain an adjudged finding. So, not taking your post in toto, I will thus embark on specificities deriving there from:

There are different levels of command, as well as leadership inclusive. Jason Garrett, has presented a wholesome body of work through his own life as a player. He gained the fire and wholesomeness in his own gut for the battle. I won't challenge a direction with departure on this premise here.

My first issue would be directed at responsibiliy in the control arena that he does have influence and responsiveness towards....the offense.

Referring back to military corrolaries, an executive officer can still bring to bear tremendous heat on issues of execution. He was affectionately referred to by enlisted, as 'Bear.' He locked the heels of Junior Officers for lack of coordinated efforts and not bring full force into executions...before the NCO's.

The same principals apply to Jason Garrett in his slot just below Wade, and also having hands-on first choice control of the offense. The failures of this team have cringed at points of intensity, prominently on the offensive side of play. That does reflect upon his metal somewhat as well.

That other GM's through the league have deferred his hiring as a headcoach should be weighed as well. He has been found 'lacking' by outside franchise sources to this point as well.

Well, in a good organization, and this is Jason's time to serve as 'Junior,' then he had best start to take heat away from his current commander. This requires not continuing his 'hiding' in the shadows awaiting another's turn. It means saying, hey, I deserve some of the scorn. But doing this while making changes in HIS direct control. The largest amount of blown plays, execution, and game losses have been around applications in and surrounding the offense.

If he does want his chance at the end of his own rainbow, he had best get his OWN house's order cleaned up and start showing more than the recipient of success, if not wins, by the offense. It starts by making sure the standards within his own command are tip top and serving the greater good.

He's allowed his own command to be diverted, broken down, and unresponsive to causes of failures. That means he hasn't taken a personal responsibility for introducing and enforcing change himself....leadership?
 
Good post.

I've done my share of bagging on Garrett....and I stand by it. I think his playcalling is borderline criminal. I think he constantly puts the team in a position to fail.....BUT, I don't think that this is the primary problem with this team.

If he proves to be a better leader than Wade...a better commander...then I'd be all for it. Give him the reins...let someone else take over playcalling duties. Take control of the team. Demand their respect. Hell yes. Make it so.

...but I'd do it now. Give him a trial period to avoid making a mistake next year when Jerry's hands will be tied again. Let him see what he can do with this year's bunch of under achievers....it's the perfect training ground. Give him an impossible goal to reach....and see what results. If the team reacts positively.....then let him take it over.
 
tomson75;3659773 said:
Good post.

I've done my share of bagging on Garrett....and I stand by it. I think his playcalling is borderline criminal. I think he constantly puts the team in a position to fail.....BUT, I don't think that this is the primary problem with this team.

If he proves to be a better leader than Wade...a better commander...then I'd be all for it. Give him the reins...let someone else take over playcalling duties. Take control of the team. Demand their respect. Hell yes. Make it so.

...but I'd do it now. Give him a trial period to avoid making a mistake next year when Jerry's hands will be tied again. Let him see what he can do with this year's bunch of under achievers....it's the perfect training ground. Give him an impossible goal to reach....and see what results. If the team reacts positively.....then let him take it over.

Your honor, sidebar...

on point in consideration, we are talking heart of team here. The contributions of players who are at prime time already, and for experimental purposes and future projections, is almost criminal in intent for hypothetical changes. At point, a player such as Terrence Newman, or even Keith Brooking and Bradie James, ARE at optimum opportunity as to their own sacrifices and careers. We can't as fans, expect an immediate flushing of the binding elements in this season, to ease frustrations and fears in fans. Since a season is the journey of an entire year, quitting and stopping that journey at the journey's beginnings is not in order, and should be seen as unfair for the general good. Hence, as basic as common law, inappropriate if applied at this point in a procedural consideration.
 
CCBoy;3659789 said:
Your honor, sidebar...

on point in consideration, we are talking heart of team here. The contributions of players who are at prime time already, and for experimental purposes and future projections, is almost criminal in intent for hypothetical changes. At point, a player such as Terrence Newman, or even Keith Brooking and Bradie James, ARE at optimum opportunity as to their own sacrifices and careers. We can't as fans, expect an immediate flushing of the binding elements in this season, to ease frustrations and fears in fans. Since a season is the journey of an entire year, quitting and stopping that journey at the journey's beginnings is not in order, and should be seen as unfair for the general good. Hence, as basic as common law, inappropriate if applied at this point in a procedural consideration.

I don't see it as quitting. I would see it as utilizing a different strategy, a different weapon, a new approach for a desperate situation. At this point, IMO, some change is needed to give players such as Newman and Brooking a chance to make something happen this season....as of right now, they're playing behind the eight ball.

An unfit leader is an unfit leader....if a change in command is needed, haste in making that change is needed as well.
 
tomson75;3659802 said:
I don't see it as quitting. I would see it as utilizing a different strategy, a different weapon, a new approach for a desperate situation. At this point, IMO, some change is needed to give players such as Newman and Brooking a chance to make something happen this season....as of right now, they're playing behind the eight ball.

An unfit leader is an unfit leader....if a change in command is needed, haste in making that change is needed as well.

On the merit of this aspect, there is more than gut directions to look towards as indicators. There is a body of work inclusive of the past three seasons that do give more credability to seeing more unfold this season. The team still has been within seven points of the victor in games, so the core of credability is still intact, unless team direction does indeed sour and flounder as well. The team may be frustrated, but has not quit on it's boss. Change would not be the factor to change things at this point. That is establishing with a line drawn in the sand and then a battle...not during a battle itself. That instills fear, distrust, and chaos instead.
 
CCBoy;3659815 said:
On the merit of this aspect, there is more than gut directions to look towards as indicators. There is a body of work inclusive of the past three seasons that do give more credability to seeing more unfold this season. The team still has been within seven points of the victor in games, so the core of credability is still intact, unless team direction does indeed sour and flounder as well. The team may be frustrated, but has not quit on it's boss. Change would not be the factor to change things at this point. That is establishing with a line drawn in the sand and then a battle...not during a battle itself. That instills fear, distrust, and chaos instead.

We'll have to agree to disagree. What I saw last week was a team that had all but given up. If we had been playing against a more capable QB, we would have witnessed an atrocity far worse than we did...

...and there is more than one leader on a field of battle. If one fails to do his job, or puts his men in a position to fail, it is the responsibility of the leaders beneath him to recognize that and take the appropriate actions. If this team has given up on Wade (and it looks that way from a fans' perspective), then IMO, the appropriate course of action is to proceed with different leadership. If, like you say, it has not....then you're right.

We may never know, but it will be interesting to watch how it plays out.
 
tomson75;3659836 said:
We'll have to agree to disagree. What I saw last week was a team that had all but given up. If we had been playing against a more capable QB, we would have witnessed an atrocity far worse than we did...

...and there is more than one leader on a field of battle. If one fails to do his job, or puts his men in a position to fail, it is the responsibility of the leaders beneath him to recognize that and take the appropriate actions. If this team has given up on Wade (and it looks that way from a fans' perspective), then IMO, the appropriate course of action is to proceed with different leadership. If, like you say, it has not....then you're right.

We may never know, but it will be interesting to watch how it plays out.

Hey, I'm a fan, both of the sport and of the Cowboys. It all is good to me. As to specifics, my point of clarification would be no less than Dallas winning by 24. That strongly. As below, and denial for reasons causing failure have been ignored. But, I do feel that the team will come out as soldiers, and not asking for special favors in ANY form. I'm well pleased with that prospect.
 
tomson75;3659773 said:
...but I'd do it now. Give him a trial period to avoid making a mistake next year when Jerry's hands will be tied again. Let him see what he can do with this year's bunch of under achievers....it's the perfect training ground. Give him an impossible goal to reach....and see what results. If the team reacts positively.....then let him take it over.

Even moreso now than before...we definitely need a change to happen at the head coaching position.
 
Here's a military dictate for you:

Don't fight battles you can't win.

For Garrett to take the head coaching role right now would be horrible for his career. He can't win in this situation. Not this season.
 
T-RO;3662160 said:
Here's a military dictate for you:

Don't fight battles you can't win.

For Garrett to take the head coaching role right now would be horrible for his career. He can't win in this situation. Not this season.
There are interim head coaches named every season.
 
I agree that JG may be hungry and to be honest he may get a shot. That being said, the only way he can even be considered is if the front office knows for certain that his approach to his duties and the direction he would take with personnel packages and players duties would be much different than Wade and his gang of Merry Men...Well maybe not quite so Merry now.

I know this is a pipe dream and I know that several of you are not fond of the idea but Cowher is a good leader of men and regardless of what anyone says, his teams played hard and were disciplined. Those are two of the biggest problems that this team has, and has been having issues with, for several years.

Swallow your pride, pay whatever he wants, and get Cowher in here Jerry. He may be just what the doctor ordered.
 
I've been complaining about lack of leadership on this team for 5 years. Nice post.

For those of you who feel leadership doesn't matter at this level, you are clueless. It matters and it matter BIG time.
 
T-RO;3662160 said:
Here's a military dictate for you:

Don't fight battles you can't win.

For Garrett to take the head coaching role right now would be horrible for his career. He can't win in this situation. Not this season.

I feel like its six of one, half dozen of the other. One way or another we're screwed for this year.
 
Sarge;3662247 said:
I've been complaining about lack of leadership on this team for 5 years. Nice post.

For those of you who feel leadership doesn't matter at this level, you are clueless. It matters and it matter BIG time.

:clap2:
 
A complete cleansing is what this team needs. NOT a guy who is just as much to blame.

If Wade gets the fall for the defense, JG gets the fall for the O. DeCam gets the fall for ST.

Making a change without a clean sweep is just letting it fester. Gotta get rid of this mojo and get a total cleanse....
 
Jimz31;3663395 said:
A complete cleansing is what this team needs. NOT a guy who is just as much to blame.

If Wade gets the fall for the defense, JG gets the fall for the O. DeCam gets the fall for ST.

Making a change without a clean sweep is just letting it fester. Gotta get rid of this mojo and get a total cleanse....

There's a legitimate argument to be made here as well.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,566
Messages
14,545,937
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top