Red Dragon
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,395
- Reaction score
- 3,773
One thing about the Cowboys that makes me tremendously nervous each time is their tendency to call passing plays on 3rd-and-long around, say, the opponents' 38-yard line. And by 3rd-and-long, I mean, say, longer than ten yards to go.
This is a situation in which the Cowboys would be best off simply running the ball, gaining a few yards, and accepting the fourth down (and subsequent field goal attempt.)
Why? Five reasons.
Is it defeatist to just accept the 3 points and not try to continue the drive for 7? Perhaps yes. But it's the smart thing, and 3 points is always better than nothing - which is what you would almost certainly get if the pass were incomplete, intercepted, or the QB sacked.
This is a situation in which the Cowboys would be best off simply running the ball, gaining a few yards, and accepting the fourth down (and subsequent field goal attempt.)
Why? Five reasons.
- If the pass falls incomplete, then you're looking at an extremely long field goal - around 56 yards - which most coaches would turn down and prefer to punt instead.
- If your QB gets sacked, then you're even further out of field goal range.
- A passing play means the ball could be intercepted - and that would be especially likely on a 3rd-and-long play when the defense fully expects a pass.
- The likelihood of picking up a first down when you are facing a 3rd-and-12 or 3rd-and-14 is low anyway. Why take the risk of being forced out of field goal range?
- A running play would likely get at least 3-5 yards, which would make for a much more manageable field goal try.
Is it defeatist to just accept the 3 points and not try to continue the drive for 7? Perhaps yes. But it's the smart thing, and 3 points is always better than nothing - which is what you would almost certainly get if the pass were incomplete, intercepted, or the QB sacked.