GimmeTheBall!
Junior College Transfer
- Messages
- 37,682
- Reaction score
- 18,034
At this point, what else do we have to go with?
and that is what should concerns ever one.
At this point, what else do we have to go with?
But the patient's pulse is precipitously irregular and the blood pressure be falling, doctor.
That's nice if you have the corner that can do it. But, you need a physical corner anyway. And that guy will be able to tackle.
There are only three corners I can think of that can truly shut down the opposing WR:
Aqib Talib
Patrick Peterson
Darelle Revis (and he may be washed up)
Slim pickings.
The fact is that the design of pass plays is short patterns that frequently use 1, 2 or 3 step drops. The WR's are going to get their catches, it's more of a question if the corner can bring the WR down before they gain too much yardage.
YR
amazing how the costa homers disappeared so fast isn't it? I remember that BS about playing Fredbeard at guard so that the JAG could start.
Thank goodness he's not a Dallas Cowboy...he wouldn't receive any medical assistance by the crowd who carry a tar bucket and bag of feathers.
Well, that make sense because the ill and injured do a team no gud. and tar and featuers not be aerodynamic.
I may have some differing opinions about player configuration, but the rest I agree with 100%. It is what I have started advocating for as well if Marinelli cannot get better execution out of his base scheme.
RDE: Bruce Carter ??
I don't even know how to respond to RDE? a week side LB? Then putting your best safety at LB? Jeff Heath at CB? He couldn't find a ball in coverage if he tripped over it. My goodness, what about putting Dez at FS? wow.
Yes. It's actually not a new idea. Garrett has put it out there and I suspect it was brought up even last season or earlier because Hostile used to advocate for this move quite frequently when he was still posting regularly.
The defense is short probably 4 players from being a better than average D.
Thinking out of the box is not for everyone I guess. Take it in slowly, it is less painful that way. Seriously though, I warned everyone that it would be radical. I think I outlined the reasons beforehand in a clear manner. The actual personnel are simply placeholders, I am more interested in fielding a 4-3 Over Seattle styled D scheme but adding more speed (less size if absolutely need be) and hammers in the middle of the field: big bodies & big hitters. On the boundaries you need large physical corners to play physical man or man-zone (Seattle's corner are big corners who were projected to be safeties in NFL), hence me placing guys like Mitchell and Heath (who has 4.4 speed and is always around the ball but not as strong as we'd like at this point). If Cowboys bring in 2 big corners then even better.
I am projecting based on fit and potential.
Go back with your own ***** in hand, and figure it out. The posting concerning Lawrence, was to highlight a positional criteria approach that doesn't pan out when applied. Lawrence wouldn't be projected positive in that view, as some of the current defensive tackles are being incorrectly labeled.
As to your supposed being called out: “In the words of Humphrey Bogart, ‘Frankly my dear, I don’t give a damn.‘ "
Go back with your own **** in hand, and figure it out ? again, what does that mean?
I get dizzy just trying to decifer this stuff. Brush the crumbs off your belly and into the keyboard.
I'm going to get a drink.
Or as you would put it; My ability to comprehend the collaboration of nonsensically connected hyperbole is impaired by my sudden bodily craving to saturate my liver into a forgetful state.
The defense is short probably 4 players from being a better than average D.