CowboyMcCoy
Business is a Boomin
- Messages
- 12,749
- Reaction score
- 235
Remember last year when the season begun and no one knew who would be the "starter" between Jenkins and Scandrick?
I'm sure you do.
I was concerned that the staff didn't have a named "starter". But they had plan. It was called Plan Competition.
As it turned out, we found out Jenkins was last year's best corner. The guy was clutch. I won't put him up there with Newman until he shows Newman's level of consistency. But the way his emergence played out was a thing of beauty.
Now we've groomed young talent in Jenkins and Scandrick. They will only improve. These guys are young. And these guys are good, in my humble opinion.
With Roy likely on his way out, why don't we find out who our next #3WR is by letting them compete by sharing the 4th WR starting duties just like Jenkins and Scandrick did last year?
It's quite possible we could get a clearer picture of who the better WR is in 4WR sets or in 3WR sets when one of our WR is taking a break, perhaps late in the game or when one is winded or injured.
I think it's clear that unless Roy has 1,000 yards and 12 TDs that he'll be a goner simply because he costs too much. Jerry will have to take it as a lesson learned and suck up his pride. I've always said Roy has all the physical attributes, he just doesn't have the drive to win anymore. He's done it. So, imo, he's kind of lazy. Having said that, let's hope he turns it around.
I do think that we'll have very much success with on Roy our team this year. I really do think he'll find a niche' on this team and succeed.
Fans will always hate on him because he's not going to be Miles Austin nor Randy Moss, but he can play a role on this team. I just don't know if he's worth the money we pay him (as a Cowboy fan...as a Lonhorn fan, I want him on the Cowboys).
In any case, the reality is we're going to need a better 3WR next year. So with the future in mind, would it be a bad idea to name Hurd the starter for the first game and Ogletree the starter for the second?
Yes, there would be times when the staff thinks one will match up better than the other. But we saw that last year. Remember when people were calling for Jenkin's head and for Scandrick to be the starter. Jenkins blew a few things early on, but so did Scandrick.
The point is, in the end we found our player. With Crayton gone we need to know what we have in these young guys.
It worked last year. And now we have two young players, where we know almost exactly what we have and what they're capable of doing. Because next year, I don't think Roy will be a Cowboy. Just my opinion.
I hope to see Hurd start against the Skins and Ogletree against Chicago.
What you say?
What's funny now is, teams have no idea what to expect from our passing game. We showed them zilch in preseason. Ah, I smell game time coming on.
I'm sure you do.
I was concerned that the staff didn't have a named "starter". But they had plan. It was called Plan Competition.
As it turned out, we found out Jenkins was last year's best corner. The guy was clutch. I won't put him up there with Newman until he shows Newman's level of consistency. But the way his emergence played out was a thing of beauty.
Now we've groomed young talent in Jenkins and Scandrick. They will only improve. These guys are young. And these guys are good, in my humble opinion.
With Roy likely on his way out, why don't we find out who our next #3WR is by letting them compete by sharing the 4th WR starting duties just like Jenkins and Scandrick did last year?
It's quite possible we could get a clearer picture of who the better WR is in 4WR sets or in 3WR sets when one of our WR is taking a break, perhaps late in the game or when one is winded or injured.
I think it's clear that unless Roy has 1,000 yards and 12 TDs that he'll be a goner simply because he costs too much. Jerry will have to take it as a lesson learned and suck up his pride. I've always said Roy has all the physical attributes, he just doesn't have the drive to win anymore. He's done it. So, imo, he's kind of lazy. Having said that, let's hope he turns it around.
I do think that we'll have very much success with on Roy our team this year. I really do think he'll find a niche' on this team and succeed.
Fans will always hate on him because he's not going to be Miles Austin nor Randy Moss, but he can play a role on this team. I just don't know if he's worth the money we pay him (as a Cowboy fan...as a Lonhorn fan, I want him on the Cowboys).
In any case, the reality is we're going to need a better 3WR next year. So with the future in mind, would it be a bad idea to name Hurd the starter for the first game and Ogletree the starter for the second?
Yes, there would be times when the staff thinks one will match up better than the other. But we saw that last year. Remember when people were calling for Jenkin's head and for Scandrick to be the starter. Jenkins blew a few things early on, but so did Scandrick.
The point is, in the end we found our player. With Crayton gone we need to know what we have in these young guys.
It worked last year. And now we have two young players, where we know almost exactly what we have and what they're capable of doing. Because next year, I don't think Roy will be a Cowboy. Just my opinion.
I hope to see Hurd start against the Skins and Ogletree against Chicago.
What you say?
What's funny now is, teams have no idea what to expect from our passing game. We showed them zilch in preseason. Ah, I smell game time coming on.
