JBell
That's still my Quarterback
- Messages
- 5,699
- Reaction score
- 6,840
When Rivers, Brinkley, and Gachkar were first signed, there was speculation that at least two of them would be starters with the departures of Durant and Carter.
That was an excellent start to the off-season, said no one.
Rolando McClain hadn't been re-signed yet, so the signings were met with groans because all signs were pointing to a downgrade at the defense's strength last season.
Now it appears that all three of those signings were for depth purposes. Exhale. I don't see any of the three even cracking the top 4 LB spots.
The pecking order based off of Eberflus' comments appears to look like this:
1a) Lee
1b) McClain
3) Hitchens
4) Wilson
Hitchens and Wilson are the two most versatile back-ups at the position. Eberflus has said Hitchens and WIlson can play any of the three linebacker spots. That versatility was a big reason they were high on Wilson. It gives you the flexibility to mix and match guys easier in case of injuries (Ahem, Lee and McClain).
After the top 4, you have Gachkar and Brinkley.
Gachkar is the ST ace that has the ability to be a spot starter. He made Dekoda Watson expendable.
Brinkley was signed with the intention of him being a two-down starter in case things didn't work out with McClain, but now he's a luxury two down MLB. Good news is he can contribute on ST, so he's not completely useless with McClain healthy.
After the top 6, you have Rivers, Mark Nzeocha, Kyle Wilber, Cameron Lawrence, James Anderson and Will Smith.
I think only 1-2 guys make the cut from this group. Rivers was signed for the vet minimum, so he's easily expendable if he doesn't show anything in training camp. Nzeocha is intriguing because of his athleticism, but seems like a PS candidate. Wilber's days are numbered because he's not seeing the field in two LB sets and he's useless at DE. I don't know that I would call Wilber versatile, but one thing he has going for him is that he can play multiple positions (SLB and DE). Cam Lawrence is a waste of space.
That was an excellent start to the off-season, said no one.
Rolando McClain hadn't been re-signed yet, so the signings were met with groans because all signs were pointing to a downgrade at the defense's strength last season.
Now it appears that all three of those signings were for depth purposes. Exhale. I don't see any of the three even cracking the top 4 LB spots.
The pecking order based off of Eberflus' comments appears to look like this:
1a) Lee
1b) McClain
3) Hitchens
4) Wilson
Hitchens and Wilson are the two most versatile back-ups at the position. Eberflus has said Hitchens and WIlson can play any of the three linebacker spots. That versatility was a big reason they were high on Wilson. It gives you the flexibility to mix and match guys easier in case of injuries (Ahem, Lee and McClain).
After the top 4, you have Gachkar and Brinkley.
Gachkar is the ST ace that has the ability to be a spot starter. He made Dekoda Watson expendable.
Brinkley was signed with the intention of him being a two-down starter in case things didn't work out with McClain, but now he's a luxury two down MLB. Good news is he can contribute on ST, so he's not completely useless with McClain healthy.
After the top 6, you have Rivers, Mark Nzeocha, Kyle Wilber, Cameron Lawrence, James Anderson and Will Smith.
I think only 1-2 guys make the cut from this group. Rivers was signed for the vet minimum, so he's easily expendable if he doesn't show anything in training camp. Nzeocha is intriguing because of his athleticism, but seems like a PS candidate. Wilber's days are numbered because he's not seeing the field in two LB sets and he's useless at DE. I don't know that I would call Wilber versatile, but one thing he has going for him is that he can play multiple positions (SLB and DE). Cam Lawrence is a waste of space.