jazzcat22
Staff member
- Messages
- 82,513
- Reaction score
- 103,777
Hostile;2606851 said:Stanback.
Scandrick's the CB.
Yes I noticed that after I posted it, but got a phone call, and didn't get to correct it.
Thanks.
Hostile;2606851 said:Stanback.
Scandrick's the CB.
No sweat, I've done it dozens of times myself.jazzcat22;2606907 said:Yes I noticed that after I posted it, but got a phone call, and didn't get to correct it.
Thanks.
jazzcat22;2606907 said:Yes I noticed that after I posted it, but got a phone call, and didn't get to correct it.
Thanks.
DallasEast;2606942 said:Mike Furrey?
The MIKE Furrey???
**** Mike Furrey.
Chocolate Lab;2606927 said:Sure, I'd take him. Why not? He had 1086 yards just a couple of years ago -- more than TO had last year.
Chocolate Lab;2606927 said:Sure, I'd take him. Why not? He had 1086 yards just a couple of years ago -- more than TO had last year.
Chocolate Lab;2607322 said:I never said he was a world beater, just that he got 1000 yards. Which means he has to be at least pretty good.
Didn't he lead the NFC in receptions that year? Martz or no, that's an achievement.
If we can forgive TO for standing on the star (which never bothered me), why not Furrey?
dbair1967;2607350 said:I dont consider it much of an achievement, again they threw the ball all over the place from 3 and 4 WR sets almost everydown. They were also getting pasted on a weekly basis, making it even more imperative to throw the ball a ton.
He was the product of a pass happy system.
TheCount;2606785 said:Screw you guys,
Who is "we"?Chocolate Lab;2607322 said:I never said he was a world beater, just that he got 1000 yards. Which means he has to be at least pretty good.
Didn't he lead the NFC in receptions that year? Martz or no, that's an achievement.
If we can forgive TO for standing on the star (which never bothered me), why not Furrey?
YoMick;2607401 said:But STILL....
34 more yards is STILL 34 more yards.