LOL..Giants could have the most dynamic attack in the division

Cowboy Brian

@BrianLINY
Messages
15,864
Reaction score
5,053
SDCowboy85;3438684 said:
You haven't noticed a trend in his posts about Dez. Just ignore it.

na if you would actually read

Nicks showed something last year, i'll take a surer thing than a through in the dark even if the return would be less.

Jackson is an all-pro PR, and the best deepthreat wr in the game right now.
 

Cowboy Brian

@BrianLINY
Messages
15,864
Reaction score
5,053
Star4Ever;3438685 said:
O.K., I'm gonna bite. Are you serious?

Nicks showed something last year, i'll take a surer thing than a through in the dark even if the return would be less.

Jackson is an all-pro PR, and the best deepthreat wr in the game right now.










comeon this is ridiculous, hes a rookie and you people are talking like hes a savior. I like him too, but if your offered someone who has shown something, why keep someone who hasn't? Thats just dum


Same if someone said trade Eric Berry/Earl Thomas for Jarius Bryd, i'd take that trade too.
 

SDCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,805
Reaction score
22,826
Romo 2 Austin;3438686 said:
na if you would actually read

Nicks showed something last year, i'll take a surer thing than a through in the dark even if the return would be less.

Jackson is an all-pro PR, and the best deepthreat wr in the game right now.
I read your post and all your others. You hate Dez and bash him every single chance you get. You're posts are absurd at best.
 

Cowboy Brian

@BrianLINY
Messages
15,864
Reaction score
5,053
SDCowboy85;3438688 said:
I read your post and all your others. You hate Dez and bash him every single chance you get. You're posts are absurd at best.

I don't bash him at all, I hate the word "TALENT" cause it makes no sense. My logic behind fantasy trading him is sound.
 

BourbonBalz

Star4Ever
Messages
12,207
Reaction score
8,178
Romo 2 Austin;3438683 said:
Nicks showed something last year, i'll take a surer thing than a through in the dark even if the return would be less.

Jackson is an all-pro PR, and the best deepthreat wr in the game right now.


Yes i'd take those trades, and against popular opinion I don't hate Dez Bryant, just its getting insane that people are saying our 3rd WR in Dez is better than the Giants and Eagles potential elite WRs.


The NFC East is packed at the WR position, Miles, Nicks, Steve Smith, Jackson. 3 of the best young WRs in the league, a rookie isn't coming in and getting crowned #2, sorry guys :/

Nicks did show something, but that's about it. Jackson is a one trick pony. He's a tremendous deep threat, but not much else, and I'm still not convinced Jackson will be able to stay healthy throughout his career considering how small he is. While Dez has yet to take his first NFL snap, he has a lot more potential than either of those two guys. He has a combination of size, speed, strength, and skill to be a dominating player. Will he? It will be fun finding out, and because of his potential, I wouldn't give him up for any receiver any team in our division currently has on their roster. Just my opinion.
 

Cowboy Brian

@BrianLINY
Messages
15,864
Reaction score
5,053
Star4Ever;3438690 said:
Nicks did show something, but that's about it. Jackson is a one trick pony. He's a tremendous deep threat, but not much else, and I'm still not convinced Jackson will be able to stay healthy throughout his career considering how small he is. While Dez has yet to take his first NFL snap, he has a lot more potential than either of those two guys. He has a combination of size, speed, strength, and skill to be a dominating player. Will he? It will be fun finding out, and because of his potential, I wouldn't give him up for any receiver any team in our division currently has on their roster. Just my opinion.

I understand that too, but alot of players bust and given the opportunity between playing Russian roulette and taken the a more proven entity, you take the more proven entity even if the return is less.

I'll say that 10/10 times. Sean Lee, AoA. Two players who I personally believe will become elite players in the NFL, if a team offered up James Laurinities or Sean Smith, I take it. (well in Launities's case the upside is probably just as great if not more than lees)
 

BourbonBalz

Star4Ever
Messages
12,207
Reaction score
8,178
Romo 2 Austin;3438692 said:
I understand that too, but alot of players bust and given the opportunity between playing Russian roulette and taken the a more proven entity, you take the more proven entity even if the return is less.

I'll say that 10/10 times. Sean Lee, AoA. Two players who I personally believe will become elite players in the NFL, if a team offered up James Laurinities or Sean Smith, I take it. (well in Launities's case the upside is probably just as great if not more than lees)

If we were dying for a receiver with some experience right now, I might agree (probably not, but maybe). However, we have Austin, Williams, and Crayton, and I'll also add in our tight ends to the equation. As a result, I would absolutely not even entertain the idea of giving up Bryant for ANY receiver on any of our divisional rivals' rosters.
 

ScipioCowboy

More than meets the eye.
Messages
25,345
Reaction score
17,722
I can entertain the prospect of trading Bryant for Jackson, but not Hackeem Nicks. The very notion is absurd.
 

BourbonBalz

Star4Ever
Messages
12,207
Reaction score
8,178
ScipioCowboy;3438713 said:
I can entertain the prospect of trading Bryant for Jackson, but not Hackeem Nicks. The very notion is absurd.

Guess it depends on what you want from your receivers. If you want just a one trick pony like Jackson, maybe so. I'm not knocking Jackson, I'd jusr rather have a complete package, which I think Bryant will ultimately be. Jackson would give us a tremendous deep threat, but again, I'd still rather have several receivers that can make any type of catch all over the field.
 

Cowboy Brian

@BrianLINY
Messages
15,864
Reaction score
5,053
Star4Ever;3438717 said:
Guess it depends on what you want from your receivers. If you want just a one trick pony like Jackson, maybe so. I'm not knocking Jackson, I'd jusr rather have a complete package, which I think Bryant will ultimately be. Jackson would give us a tremendous deep threat, but again, I'd still rather have several receivers that can make any type of catch all over the field.

I'd rather have a speed threat opposite Miles and Witten, when you have two that can make the tough catches, why add a 3rd yaknow, Miles is also fast, hes in the low 4.4s(and by all accounts college speed was 4.29 and has dropped down to closer to his college weight this offseason, so around 4.37 next year is a good guess) so I guess he counts as both. Hm, maybe thats where the next Randy Moss is. Na probably not cause it would make to much sense.
:laugh1:
 

rysko

New Member
Messages
491
Reaction score
0
I'll take Dez over Nicks just because of the fact we don't know what Dez is yet... Nicks had a few good plays mainly against us. Jackson over Dez is an obvious right now this minute, but in the future who knows. And I really don't think the .4 difference is going to change much with Austin. He is powerful, and usually breaks tackles to get into the open. His speed was already fast enough.
 

SaltwaterServr

Blank Paper Offends Me
Messages
8,124
Reaction score
1
Romo 2 Austin;3438689 said:
I don't bash him at all, I hate the word "TALENT" cause it makes no sense. My logic behind fantasy trading him is sound.

No, you're trading a one year pedigree for an extreme amount of potential that has a better CV on the collegiate level.

Nicks was an "All-ACC" player. Yeehaw. The football powerhouse ACC.

Dez was an All-American his sophomore season.

In college Nicks had 34 more receptions, 415 more yards, and 8 fewer touchdowns. Oh, he also played 10 more games than Dez.

You want to trade that straight up? You think that is sound? Here's what it is, patently stupid. No other way to say it. Outright dumb.

A space monkey reject at NASA would possibly make that trade, but no one else in their right mind would.


SDCowboy85;3438676 said:
Hixon was a MAJOR loss for the Giants passing game. Whoever wrote that is nuts.

Not sure about that. From reading here and there, they pretty much phased Hixon out of their passing game.


Romo 2 Austin;3438693 said:
ya funny haha, I only bash the word talent and people who say Dez is the best WR since Irvin/Moss, cause thats just dum.

Sometimes it's so very easy to remember you're not old enough to buy a lottery ticket.
 

AtlCB

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,860
Reaction score
110
I'll take our passing attack over any of our division rivals. Our WR's, TE's and RB's are all better receivers than our division opponents. We also have the best QB in the division.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
103,632
Reaction score
118,112
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Romo 2 Austin;3438687 said:
comeon this is ridiculous, hes a rookie and you people are talking like hes a savior. I like him too, but if your offered someone who has shown something, why keep someone who hasn't? Thats just dum
R2A remember Dez was considered a top 5 talent and perhaps the best WR prospect since Moss.

In a couple of years you will look back on this thread and wish you could delete some of your posts.
 
Top