losing ferguson is huge

lane

The Chairman
Messages
13,184
Reaction score
5,568
what a devastating loss..

jason ferguson played very well for us..

we need to go back to 4-3

we have players on defense better suited for 4- 3 anyways.


or we can hope that ratliff or spears can take ferguson's place.

spears might actually be good at nt.

he sure as hell isn't very productive at end.
 
its probably not a good idea to change defense once the season has started...might cause some issues...we have enough of those...we'll be fine.
 
Yes.

To hell with the entire defensive philosophy employed by the head coach for 30 years.

Fergy was the key, ******t!!!
 
lane;1636637 said:
we need to go back to 4-3

we have players on defense better suited for 4- 3 anyways.

Phillips' 3-4 is similar in nature to a 4-3, so it's not that big of a deal in that respect.

Where it hurts is that Ratliff is not near the plug that Ferguson is. He can't just stand in there and trade blows with offensive linemen, esp. when they double-team the nose.
 
We lost a NT for the year, and you want to switch to a defense that requires one more DT? You're a smart one...
 
ThreeSportStar80;1636648 said:
Umm I have a sneaky suspicion that Ratliff will turn heads in the starting line up.

Even if he does, he can't play all the snaps at nose. He'll be lucky if he can play effectively in 70% of the snaps. We need a real nose tackle to at least back him up and play that other 20 or 30%. Ratliff is too small to be asked to play nose full time.
 
Why not switch, Phillips has only been coaching the 3-4 for over 20 years, makes sense! :confused:
 
NextGenBoys;1636659 said:
We lost a NT for the year, and you want to switch to a defense that requires one more DT? You're a smart one...

Instead of throwing out insults you could stop for a moment and think....hmmm. OH YEAH, we run a 34 defense where our DE's are basically hybrid DE/DT that would make very suitable DT's in a 43 defense as far as body types go.

Or not, your choice.
 
lane;1636637 said:
what a devastating loss..

jason ferguson played very well for us..

we need to go back to 4-3

we have players on defense better suited for 4- 3 anyways.


or we can hope that ratliff or spears can take ferguson's place.

spears might actually be good at nt.

he sure as hell isn't very productive at end.

How is this a surprise?

Fergy is 33-can anyone honestly say he was getting any younger?

Another Bill P "gem"-instead of getting a youngster in the draft, he shells out a $9m signing bonus to someone on the wrong side of 30.
 
ThreeSportStar80;1636648 said:
Umm I have a sneaky suspicion that Ratliff will turn heads in the starting line up.

I agree ..... I liked how he seemed to get more of a push than Fergy
 
When people suggest we go back to the 4-3, I still don't know how that really helps us?

Spears moves inside to teh 1 tech and Ratliff plays the 3 Tech? Then what? Canty is not a 4-3 end. So you go Ware and Spencer at DE? So you roll with 2 250lbs DE's? You also got 2 MLB in Aydole and James.

We don't need to worry though. This scenario won't happen.
 
Billy Bullocks;1636762 said:
When people suggest we go back to the 4-3, I still don't know how that really helps us?

Spears moves inside to teh 1 tech and Ratliff plays the 3 Tech? Then what? Canty is not a 4-3 end. So you go Ware and Spencer at DE? So you roll with 2 250lbs DE's? You also got 2 MLB in Aydole and James.

We don't need to worry though. This scenario won't happen.

I agree, it doesn't and we won't.
 
Losing Ferguson is huge.

Also, the internet is huge. In case you hadn't heard.

0811john4.jpg
 
We'll probably be pretty average against the run this year b/c of Fergy being out. But I think Ratliff may be better suited for the Phillips 34, while Ferguson was the perfect fit for the Parcells 34. I'm not tryin' to sugar coat it but the fact is Ratliff is a better pass rusher than Ferguson
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,053
Messages
13,786,128
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top