Lousaka Polite and the FB position.

Banned_n_austin

Benched
Messages
5,834
Reaction score
10
From what I've seen of this guy I like. And the FB position at this point is only interesting because there is really only one true FB competing for the position. Of course Bickerstaff is competing there also. But my guess - if actions are any indication - is that Polite will make the 53 man roster.

I'm guessing Bickerstaff will be cut.

My initial intuition was that we wouldn't carry a FB on our roster. I thought we were going to be running a lot of 2 TE sets which doesn't require a FB. But running too much of that means our offense might be too vanilla.

I think we keep Polite to mix it up. And he has made a preseason TD catch.

What are thoughts on this guy?
 
I project w/ glut at rb position, and number of Te around, the fb position gets thinned out, unless one of them really shines on spec.teams play
 
No excitement talking about FB's ... it's better to argue about the backup QB position instead. :)
 
Polite in...Bickerstaff out.
Dude, your sig pic kills me every time I see it. :lmao:
 
SmashFactorGolf said:
I project w/ glut at rb position, and number of Te around, the fb position gets thinned out, unless one of them really shines on spec.teams play


It's already pretty thin my man. There is only one on the depth chart. I could be mistaken and Bickerstaff could already be cut. But I think he's still on the roster.

I think we definitely keep Polite though. We're going to need a FB this year. I'm pretty sure we keep him. But a few weeks ago I was thinking along the same lines as you.
 
austintodallas said:
Polite in...Bickerstaff out.
Dude, your sig pic kills me every time I see it. :lmao:


I agree Polite in ... Bickerstaff out.

But is Bickerstaff practice squad eligible?
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,542
Messages
13,881,732
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top