Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that it would've corrected or compensated for the dreadful lack of talent. The D would've ranked just as poor in all likelihood but zone D shouldn't have been the base scheme, esp after proving it wasn't stopping the bleeding in any way. It didn't accommodate the players that
were available for last season and players the team is depending on for the future (Carr, Mo,
Scan could play both). Just made little sense to me to accommodate the scheme
more so for the likes of Church/Heath rather than Carr/Mo/Scan. The counter would be to cover for the lack of talent but the Zone schemes sure weren't producing that result either. Just felt lazy and complacent.
I agree the ship was already sinking but it didn't bode well that the team felt that their scheme/coverages was the best they could come up with considering the gaping lack of talent @ DL and S. How bout use them corners and blitz every now n then as an option B wouldn't have been a terrible idea.
I understand it's a pretty nitpicky argument like claiming Burger King is healthier than McDonalds or something but it's the offseason